Psyops in the Third Grade

http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=3551 Natural Solutions Foundation Disinformation and Social Policy When I was in third grade if you did not like someone, you selected a story from among the stock of “terrible things you can say about people” and said it, in hushed tones, into the receptive ear of the child next to you. Then you said it again and again and again to every child of whose ear you could wrap the lips of your mount around . The story, of course, went, as we would say in today’s world, viral. It was retold, in ever growing, more lurid and shockingly graphic, to eager ears. The first hearers did not appear to be bothered by the fact that the story, repeated (after all, there were only a limited number of kids in the circuit) became more and more divergent from any possible reality. In fact, the early doubters typically dropped their doubts as the story become, in the words of classical propagandists, The Big Lie. The kid about whom all of this was circulated could say, show, scream, insist and demonstrate nothing, nothing at all, to correct the errors of the lie(s) until the blood lust of the 9 year old kids had run its course. Apparently, for many, there is no such thing as the blood lust running its course. The agents of disinformation (and the crazies, as well as the crazies who are also agents of disinformation) know this and count on it. The outstanding article below, which focuses on 9/11 truth and the difficulty in getting truth out when lies are so much more interesting, comfortable and familiar, deals with a disinformation reality: if, IF, you can get people to invest emotionally in a lie, it becomes more of a truth to them than the factual reality and they perpetuate it because it has become a part of them, attacking anyone who challenges the lie. In fact, the more effectively the lie is challenged, the more vicious and vigorous the defense of it becomes. There is no PSYOPS operative or controller who does not understand this phenomenon very well. That is why the more effective a change agent is, the more outrageous and insistent the personal attacks, smears and innuendo becomes. CIA. Works for Big Pharma. Secret Agent. Sucks Babies Brains. Reports to the Aliens. Drinks Blood. Attends Black Sabbaths. Turns into a Werewolf. Gets Government Grants. Electroshock. Mk Ultra. Works for the Dark Side. You fill in the blanks. The truth is, the real truth, that is, that the more baseless the accusation, providing that it is titillating, the more sticky the glue. It is the exact opposite of the problem of the Truth Out community: there, the more slick the lie, the more it dissolves the glue of the facts, at least in the well washed minds of the faithful. And the real truth is also that you can never, never, never prove a negative. You can prove a positive, but never disprove an assertion in the minds of the gullible who have come, as if to a bull fight, for the blood. When the angry, smeary, nasty assertions are made, facts are irrelevant to those who prefer the lie. The Natural Solutions Foundation is, without a doubt, the largest and most effective health freedom organization. Therefore we are the most often lied-about and the most often smeared. So be it. Our work is innovative, effective and impactful and those who value reality value us for that. Thank you. For those of you troubled by the Big Lies, here is our standing suggestion: please make direct contact with the source of the smears, lies, innuendos, allegations and assertions. Ask that source to provide you with the data upon which the gory story is based, not more allegations, mind you, but the actual data. If there is none (and there is none) you will get a rant and a tap dance and may even get blustered at yourself (”You have the political sophistication of a flea!” said one such person to a questioner who followed our suggestion to ask for data). By all means, send us the reply you get. We know there is no truth in the Big Lie. We trust you know that, too, because we are the Voice of Global Health Freedom(TM) because of you. Thank you. Yours in health and freedom, Dr. Rima Rima E. Laibow, MD Medical Director Natural Solutions Foundation www.HealthFreedomusa.org www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org Why Propaganda Trumps Truth By Paul Craig Roberts September 15, 2009 “Information Clearing House” — -An article in the journal, Sociological Inquiry, casts light on the effectiveness of propaganda. Researchers examined why big lies succeed where little lies fail. Governments can get away with mass deceptions, but politicians cannot get away with sexual affairs. The researchers explain why so many Americans still believe that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11, years after it has become obvious that Iraq had nothing to do with the event. Americans developed elaborate rationalizations based on Bush administration propaganda that alleged Iraqi involvement and became deeply attached to their beliefs. Their emotional involvement became wrapped up in their personal identity and sense of morality. They looked for information that supported their beliefs and avoided information that challenged them, regardless of the facts of the matter. In Mein Kampf, Hitler explained the believability of the Big Lie as compared to the small lie: “In the simplicity of their minds, people more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have such impudence. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and continue to think that there may be some other explanation.” What the sociologists and Hitler are telling us is that by the time facts become clear, people are emotionally wedded to the beliefs planted by the propaganda and find it a wrenching experience to free themselves. It is more comfortable, instead, to denounce the truth-tellers than the liars whom the truth-tellers expose. The psychology of belief retention even when those beliefs are wrong is a pillar of social cohesion and stability. It explains why, once change is effected, even revolutionary governments become conservative. The downside of belief retention is its prevention of the recognition of facts. Belief retention in the Soviet Union made the system unable to adjust to economic reality, and the Soviet Union collapsed. Today in the United States millions find it easier to chant “USA, USA, USA” than to accept facts that indicate the need for change. The staying power of the Big Lie is the barrier through which the 9/11 Truth Movement is finding it difficult to break. The assertion that the 9/11 Truth Movement consists of conspiracy theorists and crackpots is obviously untrue. The leaders of the movement are highly qualified professionals, such as demolition experts, physicists, structural architects, engineers, pilots, and former high officials in the government. Unlike their critics parroting the government’s line, they know what they are talking about. Here is a link to a presentation by the architect, Richard Gage, to a Canadian university audience: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13242 The video of the presentation is two hours long and seems to have been edited to shorten it down to two hours. Gage is low-key, but not a dazzling personality or a very articulate presenter. Perhaps that is because he is speaking to a university audience and takes for granted their familiarity with terms and concepts. Those who believe the official 9/11 story and dismiss skeptics as kooks can test the validity of the sociologists’ findings and Hitler’s observation by watching the video and experiencing their reaction to evidence that challenges their beliefs. Are you able to watch the presentation without scoffing at someone who knows far more about it than you do? What is your response when you find that you cannot defend your beliefs against the evidence presented? Scoff some more? Become enraged? Another problem that the 9/11 Truth Movement faces is that few people have the education to follow the technical and scientific aspects. The side that they believe tells them one thing; the side that they don’t believe tells them another. Most Americans have no basis to judge the relative merits of the arguments. For example, consider the case of the Lockerbie bomber. One piece of “evidence” that was used to convict Magrahi was a piece of circuit board from a device that allegedly contained the Semtex that exploded the airliner. None of the people, who have very firm beliefs in Magrahi’s and Libya’s guilt and in the offense of the Scottish authorities in releasing Magrahi on allegedly humanitarian grounds, know that circuit boards of those days have very low combustion temperatures and go up in flames easily. Semtex produces very high temperatures. There would be nothing whatsoever left of a device that contained Semtex. It is obvious to an expert that the piece of circuit board was planted after the event. I have asked on several occasions and have never had an answer, which does not mean that there isn’t one, how millions of pieces of unburnt, uncharred paper can be floating over lower Manhattan from the destruction of the WTC towers when the official explanation of the destruction is fires so hot and evenly distributed that they caused the massive steel structures to weaken and fail simultaneously so that the buildings fell in free fall time just as they would if they had been brought down by controlled demolition.What is the explanation of fires so hot that steel fails but paper does not combust? People don’t even notice the contradictions. Recently, an international team of scientists, who studied for 18 months dust samples produced by the twin towers’ destruction collected from three separate sources, reported their finding of nano-thermite in the dust. The US government had scientists dependent on the US government to debunk the finding on the grounds that the authenticity of custody of the samples could not be verified. In other words, someone had tampered with the samples and added the nano-thermite. This is all it took to discredit the finding, despite the obvious fact that access to thermite is strictly controlled and NO ONE except the US military and possibly Israel has access to nano-thermite. The physicist, Steven Jones, has produced overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the buildings. His evidence is not engaged, examined, tested, and refuted. It is simply ignored. Dr. Jones’ experience reminds me of that of my Oxford professor, the distinguished physical chemist and philosopher, Michael Polanyi. Polanyi was one of the 20th centuries great scientists. At one time every section chairman of the Royal Society was a Polanyi student. Many of his students won Nobel Prizes for their scientific work, such as Eugene Wigner at Princeton and Melvin Calvin at UC, Berkeley, and his son, John Polanyi, at the University of Toronto. As a young man in the early years of the 20th century, Michael Polanyi discovered the explanation for chemical absorbtion. Scientific authority found the new theory too much of a challenge to existing beliefs and dismissed it. Even when Polanyi was one of the UK’s ranking scientists, he was unable to teach his theory. One half-century later his discovery was re-discovered by scientists at UC, Berkeley. The discovery was hailed, but then older scientists said that it was “Polanyi’s old error.” It turned out not to be an error. Polanyi was asked to address scientists on this half-century failure of science to recognize the truth. How had science, which is based on examining the evidence, gone so wrong. Polanyi’s answer was that science is a belief system just like everything else, and that his theory was outside the belief system. That is what we observe all around us, not just about the perfidy of Muslims and 9/11.As an economics scholar I had a very difficult time making my points about the Soviet economy, about Karl Marx’s theories, and about the supply-side impact of fiscal policy. Today I experience readers who become enraged just because I report on someone else’s work that is outside their belief system. Some readers think I should suppress work that is inconsistent with their beliefs and drive the author of the work into the ground. These readers never have any comprehension of the subject. They are simply emotionally offended. What I find puzzling is the people I know who do not believe a word the government says about anything except 9/11. For reasons that escape me, they believe that the government that lies to them about everything else tells them the truth about 9/11. How can this be, I ask them. Did the government slip up once and tell the truth? My question does not cause them to rethink their belief in the government’s 9/11 story. Instead, they get angry with me for doubting their intelligence or their integrity or some such hallowed trait. The problem faced by truth is the emotional needs of people. With 9/11 many Americans feel that they must believe their government so that they don’t feel like they are being unsupportive or unpatriotic, and they are very fearful of being called “terrorist sympathizers.” Others on the left-wing have emotional needs to believe that peoples oppressed by the US have delivered “blowbacks.” Some leftists think that America deserves these blow backs and thus believe the government’s propaganda that Muslims attacked the US. Naive people think that if the US government’s explanation of 9/11 was wrong, physicists and engineers would all speak up. Some have (see above). However, for most physicists and engineers this would be an act of suicide. Physicists owe their careers to government grants, and their departments are critically dependent on government funding. A physicist who speaks up essentially ends his university career. If he is a tenured professor, to appease Washington the university would buy out his tenure as BYU did in the case of the outspoken Steven Jones. An engineering firm that spoke out would never again be awarded a government contract. In addition, its patriotic, flag-waving customers would regard the firm as a terrorist apologist and cease to do business with it. In New York today there is an enormous push by 9/11 families for a real and independent investigation of the 9/11 events. Tens of thousands of New Yorkers have provided the necessary signatures on petitions that require the state to put the proposal for an independent commission up to vote. However, the state, so far, is not obeying the law. Why are the tens of thousands of New Yorkers who are demanding a real investigation dismissed as conspiracy theorists? The 9/11 skeptics know far more about the events of that day than do the uninformed people who call them names. Most of the people I know who are content with the government’s official explanation have never examined the evidence. Yet, these no-nothings shout down those who have studied the matter closely. There are, of course, some kooks. I have often wondered if these kooks are intentionally ridiculous in order to discredit knowledgeable skeptics. Another problem that the 9/11 Truth Movement faces is that their natural allies, those who oppose the Bush/Obama wars and the internet sites that the antiwar movement maintains, are fearful of being branded traitorous and anti-American. It is hard enough to oppose a war against those the US government has successfully demonized. Antiwar sites believe that if they permit 9/11 to be questioned, it would brand them as “terrorist sympathizers” and discredit their opposition to the war. An exception is Information Clearing House. Antiwar sites do not realize that, by accepting the 9/11 explanation, they have undermined their own opposition to the war. Once you accept that Muslim terrorists did it, it is difficult to oppose punishing them for the event. In recent months, important antiwar sites, such as antiwar.com, have had difficulty with their fund raising, with their fund raising campaigns going on far longer than previously. They do not understand that if you grant the government its premise for war, it is impossible to oppose the war. As far as I can tell, most Americans have far greater confidence in the government than they do in the truth. During the Great Depression the liberals with their New Deal succeeded in teaching Americans to trust the government as their protector. This took with the left and the right. Neither end of the political spectrum is capable of fundamental questioning of the government. This explains the ease with which our government routinely deceives the people. Democracy is based on the assumption that people are rational beings who factually examine arguments and are not easily manipulated. Studies are not finding this to be the case. In my own experience in scholarship, public policy, and journalism, I have learned that everyone from professors to high school dropouts has difficulty with facts and analyses that do not fit with what they already believe. The notion that “we are not afraid to follow the truth wherever it may lead” is an extremely romantic and idealistic notion. I have seldom experienced open minds even in academic discourse or in the highest levels of government. Among the public at large, the ability to follow the truth wherever it may lead is almost non-existent. The US government’s response to 9/11, regardless of who is responsible, has altered our country forever. Our civil liberties will never again be as safe as they were. America’s financial capability and living standards are forever lower. Our country’s prestige and world leadership are forever damaged. The first decade of the 21st century has been squandered in pointless wars, and it appears the second decade will also be squandered in the same pointless and bankrupting pursuit. The most disturbing fact of all remains: The 9/11 event responsible for these adverse happenings has not been investigated. This entry was posted on Sunday, September 27th, 2009 at 5:44 pm and is filed under The Law & CODEX . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

No quiet fadeaway for federal insurance option

Insurance industry may have unwittingly helped the case for a public plan

updated 8:23 p.m. PT, Wed., Oct . 14, 2009

MSNBC

WASHINGTON - Fears about high costs of the health care overhaul and mistrust of insurers are rekindling interest in letting the government sell health insurance as part of the plan. The leading congressional proposal as of Wednesday — a Senate Finance bill that relies on private coverage with no new government plan — could price out some 17 million Americans. And the insurance industry may have unwittingly helped the case for public coverage with a report over the weekend asserting the Finance bill would raise premiums for everyone. Business groups and conservatives remain steadfastly opposed to government insurance — formidable political opposition that shows no sign of weakening. So advocates are getting creative, trying to reformulate the "public option" in a way that can gain the 60 votes needed to clear the Senate.For the full story click here: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33320171

'O,' say can you see Obama's face on U.S. flag?

Readers promise to track down those modifying Old Glory

Posted: October 12, 2009

10:00 pm Eastern

© 2009 WorldNetDaily

A seller on eBay has been offering American flags with the stars removed from the blue field and President Barack Obama's face inserted, and outraged bloggers have promised to track the banners down. "To whoever is currently manufacturing and selling those flags..... I will personally and legally hunt each of you down for the sole purpose of making citizens arrests and prosecuting each and every one of you to the fullest extend of the law under U.S. Code pertaining to the flag of the United States of America," wrote one participant in a forum at Atlas Shrugs, where blogger Pamela Gellar posted the images. "Understand this.... you have every right in the world to support the person you voted for and I will stand right in front of you in the line of fire to defend that right. But the instant you put a single man on a higher pedestal than the law, whatever games you are playing are over and you lose..... maybe forever."For the full story click here: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=112762

Thought Police

In the movie "1984'', there was a group called "thought police" who would control the thoughts of the people in a "police state" atmosphere. Information was constantly controlled as history would be re-written in the film to shape and mold the minds of the people-slaves in the controlled cities.

This film, however, is not just a fantasy any longer. The police state is emerging on a tremendous level with the G20 Summit meetings, H1N1 "Pandemic" scare tactics, Bailout-robberies against the people of the United States, FEMA internment Camps, Renditioning of so-called domestic terrorists, czars running the White House under a Narcissistic Commander in Chief, and a Corporatist system meant to totally enslave us- all for the sake of a "New World Order".

Although I have reported on these events, and even made a Documentary, I never actually experienced the far reaching hand of this Globalist Cabal until recently. I have worked at my job now for over 6yrs, and recently began to inform those of my fellow workers about the plot of " Global Governance" through total enslavement and population control measures being carried out by secret groups conspiring together to bring about a New World Order. I copied several Documentaries including "Obama Deception" and "Endgame" by Alex Jones, as well as some other revealing Documentaries by other organizations that work to expose the agenda of a New World Order.

I even went as far as making a Documentary-"Terror Camps:The Global Agenda. Many at my job began to listen and take heed to what I was saying, and rejected (so far anyway) taking the vaccines for H1N1, and also themselves began to spread the information given to them by me. But just like the movie "1984", there were those who are brainwashed by the Corporate Media, as well as bound to the Corporatist Statist company we work for, who decided to turn me in to the Store Director saying I was disseminating information accusing the Government of exploding the Twin Towers on 9/11/2001, and that I was accusing Barack Obama of conspiring with other Elitists to turn over the Sovereignty of the U.S. to a Global Cabal in order to deplete the U.S. of all its resources and enslave us.

My Store Director then called me up to his office, ( his office is up on the second floor and has a window view into the store where he can see everything that goes on- Big Brother is always watching) and proceeded to tell me that I was not allowed to talk about such "conspiracy theories" amongst the workers. I also was told that I could not bring "propaganda" of any kind relating to my own opinions of what may or may not have happened on 9/11/2001. I was told that if this was reported of again that disciplinary actions would be taken. I then left the office feeling both a sense of anger, and the unpleasant feeling of being watched at every turn. A friend of mine has often times warned me about being so open in my dealings concerning reporting on my website, and attending meetings with other Patriotic Americans who are concerned about the future of our great country, but what is life if I have to hide in my house and go to work like a corporate robot conforming to the tyranny of homicidal Globalists bent on enslaving me and my family through taxation, humiliation, fear mongering, restriction, deviation, and ultimately Termination through several programs and agendas that have been in the works for hundreds of years? This tyranny is not something that is far from us, or something to be watched on T.V. in a make-believe world. It's here!!!

The prophesies of Revelation are not something of the distant future any longer, and we all better wake up, and prepare for what is to come!! " I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night comes , when no man can work." John 9:4. We have to work against this evil while it is still day, because when the darkness comes, no man will be able to work.

The final stages are being set, in my opinion, for the darkest time in the history of mankind- a time that will eclipse the holocaust of Hitler, the murderous regimes of Lenin, Stalin, Moa, Polpot, and every other Tyrant in the annals of time. If you are reading this, then you at least feel there is something terribly wrong! You must now act on that feeling and become involved with others who love Freedom, and refuse to serve anyone but the Almighty Creator of Heaven and Earth- Yahweh!!!! I'm sure there are those of you who also work in the corporatist society, who also are starting to feel the unseen hand of the New World Order Bearing down upon you. In the book "Corporatism: The Secret Government of the New World Order", By Jeffery Grupp, it states:

  "It is staggering how much the worker will sacrifice her spirit and her passion for this idea, called " the corporation", that she somehow imagines is over-and-above her. Think about it, the worker will give up his/her family, leisure time, and consciousness in order to spend nearly all of her waking hours at an occupation that she most likely does not even enjoy, or likely even bitterly hates. Is this any sort of life?......... In her corporatized state of existence, the worker is endlessly pushed around by the forces of her corporatized life, unable to change her destiny, and the worker will likely gain the idea that the corporation is a force beyond her or him, and thus some degree of helplessness is all that is left. This is what the lifestyle of the average American is rooted in, and its end result is the TV- culture that pervades America: Americans are helpless, with unfulfilled passions, with no time to figure out who they are or what is happening in the world around them-they are lost, and only the TV is left for them- their nightly best friend. To paraphrase what Leuren Moret once said about television and media: by filling their minds with television, Americans fill their homes with their own mind-control devices. It is the corporatized, helpless, slave-like existence of the American laborer that helps make the televisual addiction so catchy. When there is little hope and little enjoyment, addiction is a luxury, since seeking out and delving into one's passions is impossible, and only a desperate escape from life seems practical." Pgs 54-55. 

The average American will just go home, after they are dead tired from working, and turn on the "Boob Tube", as they gorge themselves on genetically altered food and soft drinks, (or alcoholic beverages), and watch either some socially deviant show (like Family Guy), or the controlled Media News thinking nothing about the crisis unfolding around them. Not only do these companies overwork you, but they are now telling you what you can and cannot talk about in the workplace! Is this not a violation of free speech? Since when is it right for a boss to say you can't give your opinion about an event in history because it might offend someone? We as Americans have to become bold in our determination to remain free!!

If we remain silent, hoping they will just leave us alone, then the night will truly come upon us when we will not have any chance to regain and maintain freedom and dignity!!! Don't sleep!!! Awake to truth and break away from the thought police Now!!!!!

"Yoseph"-The Patriotic American.

Update: This article can also be seen at:

  http://www.infowars/thought police

Interpol and U.N. Back ‘Global Policing Doctrine’

By DOREEN CARVAJAL Published: October 11, 2009

PARIS — Interpol and the United Nations are poised to become partners in fighting crime by jointly grooming a global police force that would be deployed as peacekeepers among rogue nations driven by war and organized crime, officials from both organizations say. On Monday, justice and foreign ministers from more than 60 countries, including the United States and China, are gathering in Singapore for a meeting hosted by the two international organizations. It is the first step toward creating what Interpol calls a “global policing doctrine” that would enable Interpol and the United Nations to improve the skills of police peacekeepers, largely by sharing a secure communications network and a vast electronic trove of criminal information, including DNA records, fingerprints, photographs and fugitive notices. “We have a visionary model,” said Ronald K. Noble, secretary general of Interpol and the first American to head the international police organization, which is based in Lyon. More than 187 member nations finance the organization. For the full story click here: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/12/world/europe/12iht-interpol.html?_r=1