September 11, 2011
I don't believe the official
story of 9/11 because I know the official story of 9/11!
During the past 10 years I have not met a
single individual who, after doing research on the
subjectpen, switched from questioning the official narrative of the events of
9/11/2001 to believing the official narrative of those events.. It is
always the other way around. Why do you think that is? There are good
reasons for this, and I will try to explain this phenomenon right
now.
The term "
conspiracy theorist", perhaps the most misapplied description
in our vernacular, is often used to describe 9/11 truthers. Perhaps that term
does apply to a segment of the 9/11 truth movement. But in most cases a more
accurate description of 9/11 truthers is probably "expert", or "scholar", or
"researcher." You see, much of the doubt cast on the official narrative of the
events of 9/11 has not come in the form of speculated accusations, or
"theories." In fact, it has come in the form of questions that have been raised
after a careful study of the official and undisputed events and details.
Ten years have passed since the infamous
events of September 11th, 2001 took place, and the majority of people still
don't know a damn thing about the actual details of that event. They don't know
what was going on in the country with regard to our military that day. They
don't know the history or the activities of key members of our government,
defense establishment or intelligence community, on, or during the weeks, and in
some cases the years leading up to that day. They don't know what took place
during or immediately following the events of that day. And they don't know what
actions were taken by those key people following that event.
As is the case with so many issues,
people tend to stand strong and argue a position or voice an opinion about an
event like 9/11. But, when questioned about the many details surrounding that
event they have no answers. They are clueless. And they are, in the end,
dumbfounded.
I can not tell you how many times I
have discussed the events of 9/11 with an outraged citizen who can not believe
that I would "accuse our own government" of such a terrible thing as conducting
a false flag operation, only to hear the phrase "no, I did not know that, is
that true?" repeated over and over as I "educate" them about those little things
called DETAILS. I can not count the pale-faced stunned looks on people's faces
as I exposed them to some of the "official facts" they never suspected, and
never knew. I have walked away from many a confrontation with newly educated
"patriotic Americans", only to worry about whether or not they would again resume breathing correctly.
They would never do such a
thing
A common start and end to any intelligent
discussion about the events of 9/11 is prefaced by the assumption that no
American would betray his or her country by allowing or conducting an attack on
the American people. Well, the people who take this position know nothing about
history, let alone human nature. They also don't know about the
public positions, declarations, speeches and published documents written by the
people who ran our nation on that day.
False flag operations have taken place
for generations, in this nation and nations around the world. Many of these
operations have been exposed, but proof of many of these activities is probably
hidden away in secret documents that may one day come to light. You can however,
start your exploration on the topic by researching one plan for American
self-inflicted terrorism that became public,
Operation
Northwoods. Do I detect my first "I did not know this, is it true?" May I
suggest you also peek into
the neoconservative teachings of the principles involved in
running our nation at the time of the "new Pearl Harbor" that took place in
2001.
But the 9/11 Commission did
not find anything wrong
I can not believe how many people do not
know the genesis or mission of the 9/11 Kean Commission. From the initial
appointment of one of America's most nefarious political figures as its original
leader, Henry Kissinger, - to its
executive director whose area of
expertise and education were in the
creation and maintaining of public myths,
Philip D.
Zelikow,- people have no idea as to who comprised or what the mandate was
for this commission.
To give you some kind of idea as to why
the "findings" of this commission can NOT be used to back up any talking points
on the topic of 9/11, let me remind you what the official task of this
commission was. The Kean Commissions was told to document the official story and
make national security recommendations based on that story. The
only information that was to be included in the official report had to
match the official story. If any one member of the committee
objected to any testimony or finding, that piece of information was to be left
out of the report For some examples of this you can talk to the thousands of
people who became 9/11 truthers as a result of their testimony being omitted
from and contradicted by the final report.
Start with the WTC worker credited with
being the last man out of the WTC
William Rodriguez. See if he can tell you why, after being
invited to the White House and
meeting with George W. Bush, his
testimony about witnessing explosions in the sub basement of the WTC moments
prior to the first plane hitting the building was omitted from the Kean report.
And for more details you can read David Ray Griffin's book called
The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions. It
pretty much translated the Kean report into a stack of rather harsh and useless
toilet
paper. Are the "I did not know this, is it true?" responses
piling up yet?
