SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
December 7,2009
By
Mark Matheny
The Copenhagen Conspiracy on Climate Control convenes this week, and the true agenda behind the scam is world government-plain and simple.
This week's Copenhagen conference marks another step toward world government as 192 nations come together in Copenhagen to carry out vital stages toward draining the wealthier nations of wealth, and instituting international regulations upon those countries, which will also affect every individual within those countries. There are 110 world leaders who are attending this summit, with plans to agree to deep cuts in "green house gas emissions" for the rich by the year 2020, and supposedly to also raise billions of dollars for the poor in aid.
The real plan is far more sinister however, a plan that sounds like something out of the book,
1984, by George Orwell. Today's meeting actually traces back to 1972, when economic development and environmental degradation was placed on the international agenda at the UN conference on the Human environment, which was held at that time in Stockholm. Shortly after, governments set up the United Nations Environment Programme, or (UNEP). UNEP was set up to begin the process of establishing "protection of the environment" according to the programme itself, but the true agenda is really to reduce the world's population, and to erase all sovereign bounderies from countries in order to create a world governing body under the term "global governance".
In 1992, in Rio de Janiero, the UN Conference on Environment and Developement was held where 108 heads of state or government brought about three major agreements which would aim at achieving three major objectives toward world government:
- Agenda 21- this would ba a comprehensive plan of action globally, in all areas of 'sustainable development'.
- The Rio Declaration on Environment and development- this would be a series of principles defining rights and responsiblilities of states.
- The Statement of Forest Principles- a set of principles to underlie the sustainable management of forests worldwide.
But it didn't stop here. there were also two legally binding conventions aimed at bringing measures to prevent the bogus "global warming" or "climate change", and the eradication of the diversity of biological species.
The globalists bent on total enslavement of the world's population have contrived the idea of a "global environmental threat" to replace the "cold war threat", and through these summits hope to impose a Global Carbon Tax. Through the "
Statement of Forest Principles" they are taking control of all of our national forests and parks renamed as "Boispheres- which are to be set aside to protect forests- or so they say. The real plan is to ultimately set up buffer zones around the
Biospheres, in which human movement will be highly regulated. The goal for the U.S. will be to have only 50% of the land mass where any human movement will be very limited, and only 25% (of that 50% of land) on which humans will live, in highly regulated and control cities.
All activities will be monitored by civilian as well as environmental police.
Maurice Strong was the Secretary General who headed the UNCED meeting in 1992, and is one of several involved in this agenda to bring about a "New World Order". He is a
senior advisor to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, and former senior advisor to the President of the World Bank. He also served on the board of directors for the United Nation's Foundation. This UN-affiliated organization was established by another elitist-Ted Turner with an historic $1 billion dollar donation. Ted Turner of course would like to see the world's population drop
to at least 2 billion total (there are about 6.5 billion currently). He has also said it should be as low as 250-300 million. This is similar to the
Georgia guidestones in Georgia, which state that humanity should be at 500 million.
Maurice Strong, along with other elitists, understood that the richer countries of the world, which are sovereign and independent would not be willing to throw their riches into a global melting pot, or cast away the clothing of sovereignty to become a part of a Global Government unless they would be forced to do so through some sort of crisis. This crisis, he felt, would have to be an economic crisis.
"The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. [...] Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilization collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”
--Maurice Strong, co-creator of Kyoto Protocol
The United States would be the primary target of this plan for economic collapse and emergence into the New World Order. We are now experiencing the birth pangs of the New World Order being brought to life. In 2002 Maurice Strong stated in a meeting;
The tragic events of September 11th dramatically brought home to us that the phenomena we now refer to as globalization, which has opened up so many new and exciting opportunities, has also united us in facing a new generation of risks, imbalances and vulnerabilities. Risks to our personal security, the security of our homes, offices and communities and, more fundamentally, risks to the earth’s’ life-support systems on which the survival and well being of the entire human family depends. These risks and vulnerabilities are inextricably linked through the complex, systemic processes of globalization by which human activities are shaping our common future. They cannot be understood or dealt with in isolation. Nor can they be managed alone by any nation, however powerful. Indeed, they require a degree of cooperation beyond anything we seem yet prepared to accept.
Statement of Maurice F. Strong,
Chairman Earth Council Foundation
at hearing of the United States Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works
and the Committee on Foreign Relations
on July 24, 2002
One thing you will notice about the globalist agenda for a "New World Order" is a common theme of engineered crisis in order to bring about this world government. (Here are just three- I'm sure there are more to this)
- The environmental crisis called "Global warming" or "Climate change" which is being engineered through false information, and media hysterics.
- The Terror Crisis which was engineered through the 9/11 False Flag operation to bring about a Police State here in the United States, and to take control of the Middle East.
- The financial crisis which was brought about through a manufactured "subprime mortgage" crisis when US banks gave out high risk loans to people with poor credit histories. These loans and other loans, bonds, and assets were bundled into portfolios-collateralised Debt Obligations(CDOs)-and sold globally to investors.
When housing prices started to fall (remember, many mortgage companies were inflating appraisals to get better commissions) and interest rates began to rise, many families could not afford to pay their mortgages.
This then brought on a "domino effect" as investors started to suffer losses, they became reluctant to take on more CDOs and credit markets froze as banks became reluctant to lend to other banks, unsure how many toxic loans might be on their rivals' books. To make a long story short, this leads to bailouts and bancrupty, and a failing dollar as the reserve currency of the world, which in then turns into G20 Summit meetings and monetary reforms on a global scale.
As for the Copenhagen meetings, these stem from the environmentally contrived crisis in order to bring about the last stages of America's decline as a republic and as an independent nation in order to transfer the wealth of the U.S. to other countries.
The International Monetary Fund has therefore been the subject in the G20 meetings, in order to transform
...the IMF into,virtually, a global Federal Reserve system, with vast new monetary and regulatory powers-and huge new infusions of cash to be provided principally, as usual, by the citizens of the United States, Japan, and Europe
The IMF would also
...assume a central role in monitoring and regulation of global financial markets,and greatly expand Communist China's influence in the IMF structure.[1]
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Managing Director for the IMF stated the the world economic crisis stemmed from the richer countries mistakes, and therefore would need to support their poorer neighbors. This was stated in a press release issued September 17,2009. Of course the money given out by the IMF to these poorer countries never seems to help those underdeveloped countries to become better developed! As G. Edward Griffin once stated about the IMF
" the International Monetary Fund gives money to these inefficient dictators of the third world countries, and makes them into efficient dictators!" (Paraphrased) [2]
The IMF acts in cooperation with the World Bank. In
The Creature from Jekyl Island, G. Edward Griffin explains the true role, or the hidden agenda of the IMF and World Bank as instruments to bring about socialism
Although most of the policy statements of the world Bank deal with economic issues, a close monitoring of its activities reveal a preoccupation with social and political issues. This should not be surprising considering that the Bank was percieved by its founders as an instrument for social and political change. The change which it was designed to bring about was the building of world socialism, and that is exactly what it is accomplishing today. This hidden agenda becomes crystal clear in the nature of what the Bank calls Sectoral Loans and Structural-Adjustment Loans. In the first category, only part of the money is to be used for the costs of specific projects while the rest goes to support policy changes in the economic sector. In the second group, all of the money is for policy changes and none of it is for projects. In recent years, almost half of the loans to underdeveloped countries have been in that category. What are the policy changes that are the object of these loans? They add up to one thing: the building of world socialism. Pg 96.
What do you think will be done with all the money brought into the IMF and World Bank with the passing of legislation which will bring about a global Carbon Tax? Will they use it to reduce carbon emmission? Will they use funds given to the third world countries to bring developement and better living conditions? Again we will look at the track record of the IMF and world Bank to see what a marvelous job they have already achieved. Take for example Africa, where billions have gone for "development" from the International Monetary Fund into the hands of dictators
Nowhere is the pattern more blatant than in Africa. Julius Nyerere, the dictator of Tanzania, is notorious for his "villagization" program in which the army has driven the peasants from their land, burned their huts, and loaded them like cattle into trucks for relocation into government villages. The purpose is to eliminate opposition by bringing everyone into compounds where they can be watched and controlled.Meanwhile the economy staggers, farms have gone to weed, and hunger is commonplace.Yet, Tanzania has recieved more aid per capita from the World Bank than any other nation. (Emphasis mine)
In Uganda, government security forces have engaged in mass detentions, torture, and killing of prisoners. The same is true under the terrorist government in Zimbabwe. Yet, both regimes continue to be the recipients of millions of dollars in World Bank Funding. (Emphasis mine)
The IMF was represented in Zimbabwe at the time by Michel Camdessus, the Governor of the central bank of France, and a former finance minister in fransois Mitterand's Socialist government. After being informed of Zimbabwe's plan to confiscate additional land and to resettle the people to work on those lands, Camdessus agreed to a loan valued at 42 billion rands with full knowledge that much of it would be used for the resttlement project. (Emphasis mine). [3]
So how does the IMF tie into the summit at Copenhagen? According to
France24.com, IMF experts said on Friday, just days before the Copenhagen Summit, that a global pact would help the world's poorest who face the worst effects of rising temperatures. "Greater climate resilience can promote macroeconomic stability and alleviate poverty," Michael Keen and Benjamin Jones of the Global lender's fiscal affairs department wrote in a staff position note.
Ken Ewert explains in his book,
The International Monetary Fund, how conditions imposed by the IMF through "macroeconomics" or "macro-policies" are seldom free-market oriented.
The Fund concentrates on "macro-policies," such as fiscal and monetary policies or exchange rates, and pays little attention to fundemental issues like private property rights and freedom of enterprise. Implicit... is the belief that with proper "macromanagement" any economic system is viable....Even more important, it has allowed governments of the world over to expropriate the wealth of their citizens more efficiently (throught the hidden tax of inflation)while at the same time aggrandizing their own power.There is little doubt that the IMF is an influence for world-wide socialism. [4]
Clear and simple, the Summit in Copenhagen seeks to put another nail in the coffin off sovereign nation-states, and to drain the wealth of the richer countries, while giving more power to the UN, IMF, and the World Bank, in order to usher in the agenda of the ages- a New World Order.
Now we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is a very real prospect of a new world order. In the words of Winston Churchill, a "world order" in which "the true principles of justice and fair play...protect the weak against the strong..." A world where the United Nations, freed from a cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfil the historic vision of its founders." -George Bush Sr. 1991
Mark Matheny
Sources:
[1] "Global Fusion"- The New American Magazine, pg 11: April 27,2009
[2] "The Creature from Jekyl Island" Audio CD, G.Edward Griffin
[3] "The Creature from Jekyl Island" By G. Edward Griffin. Pgs 95-99
[4] "The International Monetary Fund" By Ken S. Ewert, The Freeman, April, 1989,pp. 157,158.
