Saturday, September 15, 2012

US-Backed Terrorists Murder US Ambassador in Libya

Global Research
September 14, 2012

Murdered US Ambassador exposes Libya "progress" propaganda - provides a warning against US meddling in Syria

- “I have met with these brave fighters, and they are not Al-Qaeda. To the contrary: They are Libyan patriots who want to liberate their nation. We should help them do it.” – Senator John McCain in Benghazi, Libya April 22, 2011.
McCain’s “Libyan patriots” have now murdered US Ambassador John Christopher Stevens in the very city McCain spoke these words. An assault on the American consulate in the eastern city of Benghazi, the epicenter of not only last year’s violent subversion and destruction of sovereign Libya, but a decade’s old epicenter of global terrorism, left Ambassador Stevens dead along with two of his aides.
The violence, Western media claims, stems from an anti-Islamic film produced in the US. In reality, the coordinated nature of the attacks on both the US Embassy in Libya, as well as its embassy in Cairo, Egypt, on the 11th anniversary of 9/11, are most likely using the Neo-Conservative Clarion Fund-esque propaganda film as a false pretense for violence long-planned. The Clarion Fund regularly produces anti-Muslim propaganda, like “Iranium,” specifically to maintain a strategy of tension using fear and anger to drive a wedge between Western civilization and Islam to promote perpetual global wars of profit.

Image: Senator John McCain in the terrorist rat nest of Benghazi after marshaling cash, weapons, and political support for militants tied directly to Al Qaeda. McCain’s insistence that the terrorists he helped arm and install into power were “not Al Qaeda” runs contra to the US Army’s own reports which state that Benghazi’s terror brigades officially merged with Al Qaeda in 2007. McCain’s “Libyan patriots” have now killed US Ambassador Stevens with RPG’s most likely procured with cash and logistic networks set up by NATO last year, part of a supranational terror campaign that includes violently subverting Syria – a campaign McCain also supports.

Bernanke’s Monetary Stimulus Helps Only Zombie Banks; Obama’s Stimulus Not Enough; Force Fed to Start Credit Stimulus via Main Street Window to Buy 0% Coupon 100-Year State Infrastructure Bonds

September 14, 2012

Webster G. Tarpley, Ph.D.
September 14, 2012

Friday, September 14, 2012

Schiff: QE is Final Nail in Dollar’s Coffin

Schiff Report
September 14, 2012

LIBYA: Pentagon sending elite anti-terrorism Marines

Foreign Policy
September 12, 2012

The U.S. is deploying elite Marine counterterrorism teams to Libya in response to the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens.

The Pentagon is sending Fleet Anti-Terrorism Teams, known as FAST teams, a U.S. defense official has confirmed to the E-Ring.

The official was unsure if the teams were actually en route to Libya yet.

"Make no mistake, justice will be done," President Obama said, in a statement in the Rose Garden early Wednesday. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is not expected to appear on camera today.

UPDATE: A U.S. defense official confirms to the E-Ring there are "about 50" people in the FAST teams deployed to Libya. Pentagon officials won't say with specificity yet if the teams will protect just the U.S. embassy in Tripoli or additional sites, including the consulate in Benghazi. 

"The goal is to shore up security around our installations," said a US defense official, and work to get the Libyans back in control of security. 

Libyan officials, the US official said, are "being very cooperative" with the Pentagon and "doing all of the right things," but "obviously there was some breakdown" of security. 

Still unknown is how long the teams could stay.  A senior military official told the E-Ring that FAST teams could stay "as long as needed -- days, weeks, even months." Their deployment could be a precursor to additional troop deployments, the official said, but doesn't have to be. 

UPDATE: The U.S. Marine Corps' FAST Team members are on the ground in Libya, at the U.S. embassy in Tripoli, a senior administration official confirmed. They came from Naval Station Rota, in Spain.

Revealed: inside story of US envoy's assassination

The Independent
September 14, 2012

Exclusive: America 'was warned of embassy attack but did nothing'

The killings of the US ambassador to Libya and three of his staff were likely to have been the result of a serious and continuing security breach, The Independent can reveal.

American officials believe the attack was planned, but Chris Stevens had been back in the country only a short while and the details of his visit to Benghazi, where he and his staff died, were meant to be confidential.

The US administration is now facing a crisis in Libya. Sensitive documents have gone missing from the consulate in Benghazi and the supposedly secret location of the "safe house" in the city, where the staff had retreated, came under sustained mortar attack. Other such refuges across the country are no longer deemed "safe".
Some of the missing papers from the consulate are said to list names of Libyans who are working with Americans, putting them potentially at risk from extremist groups, while some of the other documents are said to relate to oil contracts.

According to senior diplomatic sources, the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted, but no warnings were given for diplomats to go on high alert and "lockdown", under which movement is severely restricted.
Mr Stevens had been on a visit to Germany, Austria and Sweden and had just returned to Libya when the Benghazi trip took place with the US embassy's security staff deciding that the trip could be undertaken safely.

Eight Americans, some from the military, were wounded in the attack which claimed the lives of Mr Stevens, Sean Smith, an information officer, and two US Marines. All staff from Benghazi have now been moved to the capital, Tripoli, and those whose work is deemed to be non-essential may be flown out of Libya.
In the meantime a Marine Corps FAST Anti-Terrorism Reaction Team has already arrived in the country from a base in Spain and other personnel are believed to be on the way. Additional units have been put on standby to move to other states where their presence may be needed in the outbreak of anti-American fury triggered by publicity about a film which demeaned the Prophet Mohamed.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

US Totalitarianism Loses Major Battle As Judge Permanently Blocks NDAA's Military Detention Provision

Zero Hedge
September 12, 2012

Back in January, Pulitzer winning journalist Chris Hedges sued President Obama and the recently passed National Defense Authorization Act, specifically challenging the legality of the Authorization for Use of Military Force or, the provision that authorizes military detention for people deemed to have "substantially supported" al Qaeda, the Taliban or "associated forces." Hedges called the president's action allowing indefinite detention, which was signed into law with little opposition from either party "unforgivable, unconstitutional and exceedingly dangerous." He attacked point blank the civil rights farce that is the neverending "war on terror" conducted by both parties, targetting whom exactly is unclear, but certainly attaining ever more intense retaliation from foreigners such as the furious attacks against the US consulates in Egypt and Libya. He asked  "why do U.S. citizens now need to be specifically singled out for military detention and denial of due process when under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force the president can apparently find the legal cover to serve as judge, jury and executioner to assassinate U.S. citizens." A few months later, in May, U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest ruled in favor of a temporary injunction blocking the enforcement of the authorization for military detention. Today, the war againt the true totalitarian terror won a decisive battle, when in a 112-opinion, Judge Forrest turned the temporary injunction, following an appeal by the totalitarian government from August 6, into a permanent one.
From Reuters:
The permanent injunction prevents the U.S. government from enforcing a portion of Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act's "Homeland Battlefield" provisions.

The opinion stems from a January lawsuit filed by former New York Times war correspondent and Pulitzer Prize winner Chris Hedges and others. The plaintiffs said they had no assurance that their writing and advocacy activities would not fall under the scope of the provision.

Government attorneys argued that the executive branch is entitled to latitude when it comes to cases of national security and that the law is neither too broad nor overly vague.

"This court does not disagree with the principle that the president has primacy in foreign affairs," the judge said, but that she was not convinced by government arguments.

"The government has not stated that such conduct - which, by analogy, covers any writing, journalistic and associational activities that involve al Qaeda, the Taliban or whomever is deemed "associated forces" - does not fall within § 1021(b)(2)."
What is ironic, is that in the ongoing absolute farce that is the theatrical presidential debate, there hasn't been one word uttered discussing precisely the kind of creeping totalitarian control, and Orwellian loss of constitutional rights, that the biparty-supported NDAA would have demanded out of the US republic. Why? Chris Hedges said it best:
The oddest part of this legislation is that the FBI, the CIA, the director of national intelligence, the Pentagon and the attorney general didn’t support it. FBI Director Robert Mueller said he feared the bill would actually impede the bureau’s ability to investigate terrorism because it would be harder to win cooperation from suspects held by the military. “The possibility looms that we will lose opportunities to obtain cooperation from the persons in the past that we’ve been fairly successful in gaining,” he told Congress.

But it passed anyway. And I suspect it passed because the corporations, seeing the unrest in the streets, knowing that things are about to get much worse, worrying that the Occupy movement will expand, do not trust the police to protect them. They want to be able to call in the Army. And now they can.
He is 100% correct, and today, if it weren't for his lawsuit, the saying that someone, somewhere in the world might possibly "hate America for its liberties" would have been the biggest lie conceivable.
Also, the total fascist takeover of America would now have been a fact.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

george carlin on 9/11 (our owners won't investigate themselves; dumb slaves don't notice/care)

You Tube
September 12, 2012

(Warning: Explicit Language)







9/11 Theories: EXPERT vs EXPERT part one part two

9/11 Conspiracy Theory in Under 5 Minutes

KRS-One on 9/11 & WeAreChange - Don't Give Up

We Are Change
September 11, 2012

by  You Tube

KRS-One, American Rapper & Hip-Hop legend, gives us his take on 9/11 & WeAreChange.

Follow Luke on twitter @

Become a member of The Sponsor Lounge and get exclusive behind the scenes content while helping us grow! Join us today!http:/// 

September 12, 2012

Article 1 Image
The fluoridation battle rages on in Portland, Oregon as the city council prepares to vote this Wednesday. The battle has been receiving nationwide coverage because of the undemocratic process the council is taking to force fluoridation on it’s citizens; circumventing three separate previous votes by citizens to prohibit the practice. Even officials from two separate towns that get their water from Portland are questioning the rapid and “behind closed doors” process the Portland City Council has taken in an effort to approve this practice as quickly as possible and with only the support of fluoridation lobbyists. 

The council held the public hearing on fluoridation last week, where more than 275 locals testified, with more than 60% speaking in opposition to the practice. So many people attended that they overflowed into the halls and outside of City Hall, where video screens were set up so everyone could view the hearing. The pro-fluoride lobby was given over an hour to present their case, uninterrupted, then everyone else was given 3 minutes each initially, then only 2 minutes each to make their case in opposition. This is a tactic generally used by pro-fluoride decision-makers to stifle any actual debate or balanced discussion of the issue. 

This week, Dr. Paul Connett was invited to debate forced-fluoridation lobbyist Kylie Menagh-Johnson on the KBOO morning radio show “Healthwatch”. You can listen to the entire debate here. Also this week, the U.S. Green Party presidential candidate, Dr. Jill Stein, made the following statement in regard to the Portland fluoridation battle:
            "It's a no-brainer. I support the right of the people to vote on it. It's outrageous  that it is necessary to file an initiative to get it on the ballot."

The citizens of Portland are already organizing an initiative to overturn the council’s expected approval of fluoridation on Wednesday. Clean Water Portland and FAN Oregon point person Kim Kaminski are behind the effort. If the council does approve fluoridation and citizens eventually overturn it, then it would be a huge blow and a huge embarrassment to the pro-fluoride lobby. Clean Water Portland will need all of the volunteers they can get to accomplish this task. Please sign up to volunteer. Please also take a few minutes to contact the Portland City Council to urge them to vote down the fluoridation resolution, or at least bring the question before the public. 

If you live in the Portland area, please join Dr. Paul Connett and Clean Water Portland for Fluoride Action Night on Tuesday, September 11th at the First Unitarian Church at 7pm.

Earlier this summer the Phoenix city council announced that they would be reassessing their water fluoridation program and holding public hearings to gather as much information as possible about the practice. Soon after this announcement, local community organizer and FAN contact Jody Cluteput together Fluoride Free Arizona, and immediately started taking action to end the practice that costs the city’s 1.5 million residents over a half-million dollars each year. 

Just last week, Fluoride Free Arizona hosted an unprecedented two and a half hour Lincoln-Douglas style debate on fluoridation between FAN Executive Director Paul Connet, PhD, and local dentist and fluoridationist Howard Farran, DDS. The Director of the Phoenix College debate team moderated the event, and it featured PowerPoint presentations by both speakers, two opportunities for the speakers to cross-examine each other, and audience questions. You can watch the full debate here.

The Phoenix Transportation and Infrastructure subcommittee, chaired by pro-fluoride CouncilwomenThelda Williams, held there hearing on fluoridation today. Leading the charge against fluoridation was Dr. William J. Hirzy, a chemist, a professor at American University, and a former Vice-President of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s employees union. His full testimony can be viewed here. Sadly, the subcommittee of four voted unanimously to continue the fluoridation of Phoenix’s public water supply. While this is a temporary setback, Fluoride Free Arizona will continue to build momentum locally and at the state-level, and will not be ending their fight for fluoride-free water anytime in the near future. 

If you live in Arizona, please join Fluoride Free Arizona and help them bring their battle to not only City Hall, but also the State House. 
New Documentary on Fluoridation
A new film highlighting the risks association with fluoridation has been made public and posted on YouTube. We understand it was unveiled at Portland City Hall last week and we wanted to share it all of you and urge you to share it as widely as possible with all of your friends, family, and local decision-makers. The film is entitled “An Inconvenient Tooth”, and features interviews with experts like Dan Stockin, MPH, and Paul Connett, PhD.
Stuart Cooper
Campaign Manager
Fluoride Action Network  

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Economic duplicity with low wage capitalism – Nearly half of those that lost their job between 2009 and 2011 are working in a lower wage position. The hard financial reset button.

September 11, 2012

All jobs are not created equal.  It is unfortunate that last month the drop in the unemployment rate was largely driven by hundreds of thousands of Americans simply dropping out of the labor force.  Not exactly a way to build the middle class but to many it gives the false impression that things are getting better when they are largely treading water.  Also a more trying sign of the times, a survey showing of the three million people that lost jobs between January of 2009 and December of 2011 with longer-term employment, roughly half that found a new job were making less than they once did.  In other words, these people now have jobs but at the lower wage side of the scale.  This also helps to explain why so many Americans are living day to day while facing the increasing cost of daily goods.  It is hard to believe that for over a decade, the median household income has fallen for Americans.  Young Americans are fully aware of the challenges the current economy faces because they are encountering it both in lack of savings and massive debt for college.
Replacing higher paying jobs with lower paying jobs
An interesting article highlighting this dramatic shift to lower paying jobs gives a few examples:
“(MSNBC) Michael Scarbrough, 47, made a six-figure salary for years, selling heavy construction equipment in the Atlanta area. Sales dried up in early 2009 as the housing and commercial construction market plummeted.
That’s when the family’s finances slowly began to slip. He and his wife, who have a 6-year-old son, lost their 3,200-square-foot home, their Hummer, their Corvette and most other vestiges of their more affluent life. They eventually were forced to turn to food stamps and government–subsidized housing.”
This also highlights the massive impact on consumption.  From making six-figures to being one of the 46.5 million Americans on food stamps.  Fortunes can change dramatically and in a hyper consumption based economy, things can turn south quickly caring a profound ripple effect.
In the last few years it is important to note that the top 20 percent did increase their wealth while the bottom 80 percent dropped rather significantly.  Wealth is distributed as follows:
us wealth
The problem with credit bubbles is that they create an enormous system that misallocates capital.  When the bubble pops as they always do, the misallocation becomes painfully apparent.  In the example above, it is hard to imagine how someone can make six-figures for many years and then suddenly lose it all in a few years.  Atlanta is a cheaper part of the country when it comes to housing so you have to wonder where the savings went.  Keep in mind that 1 out of 3 Americans has no savings.  Of course the article mentions a Hummer and a Corvette and these aren’t exactly economical cars.  So once the bubble popped, the artifacts of the bubble remain and you also see how poorly capital was being allocated when easy access to debt was the main vehicle to growth.
From $70,000 a year to nothing
Another example was given:
“The commute was about to become a memory – Vavrek had just learned that he was going to lose the $13-an-hour contract job he’d landed about a year and a half ago. It had been a big financial step down from when he made $70,000, plus a bonus, several years ago, but at least it was a paycheck.”
This recession has really taken a major hit to the middle class:
The middle class shrunk by 10 percent in the last decade. A bulk of these people went into the lower income category while the other group moved into the upper-income tier.  We are starting to lose what many have come to associate with America and that is a strong middle class.  Now we have sites like Rich Kids of Instagram that post pictures of rich youth spending $5,000 a bottle on Dom PĂ©rignon champagne while 46.5 million Americans wait patiently each month just to get their EBT cards refilled with funds from the government.
Most Americans are unsatisfied with their government because they realize that there are little good choices ahead.  Many are struggling just to get by on a day to day basis and are trying to live out a life that might have been more designed for America post World War II.  The baby boomer generation has vivid visions of this and many did not adequately prepare for retirement.  While they struggle they also have the employment experience that many younger Americans are fighting to get.  It isn’t exactly clear that those positions will be filled with younger Americans.  Many of the new jobs being created require an entirely different set of skills.
We discussed in a previous article the resurgence of stagflation and it is certainly beginning to feel that way.

Truth & Lies of 9-11

Fabian 4 Liberty
September 11, 2012

9-11 11 years later. The American Republic is under attack. Bold advances by the globalist have taken place after one of the greatest attacks on American soilshook the country. Today we are constantly told the government must take away our rights in order to protect us from the myth of Al Qaida even after the U.S. 
government declared the War on Terror over this April 24th, 2012.

 In the recent illegal arrest and detainment of ex Marine Brandon Raub, his attorney, who is on the 
front lines of defending 1st amendment right activists made the claim that government really does not like 9-11 truthers. Is 9-11 the Achilles heel of the New World Order?

Exposing the truth of 9-11 is critical in the fight for liberty. Regardless of what you believe there are illegitimate questions that must be answered. Why did the hijacked planes circle Washington for over an hour without being shot down? Who was in control of the air defenses that day? Why did Cheney and Bush work to suppress the investigation? How did WTC building 7 collapse when it only had a fire on a few floors and was never hit by a plane? These questions and many more must be answered and it is up to us, We The People, the citizen journalist to shed light and expose these truths or we face the potential of a much more dangerous 9-11.

 A potential false flag that will not only take place in city but be felt across this nation.

9/11 Memorial: Keep the tributes, we must honor the dead with the truth

Donna Anderson
September 11, 2012
It’s the 11th anniversary of the attacks on the World Trade Center buildings, the Pentagon, and the American people. All across the country we’ll be remembering the victims with plaques, statues and speeches. But remembering them isn’t enough. We need to uncover the truth about 9/11 so we can honor them, give some meaning to their deaths, and bring healing to our nation.
If you haven’t see the new documentary, “9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out,” I highly recommend that you take 90 minutes out of your day, sometime this week, and watch it while it’s still available free online. There’s a particularly poignant paragraph near the end that makes it perfectly clear why we must keep demanding the truth about 9/11:
“After WWII part of the way that Jewish people honored the dead was by making sure the truth was known and the value of these people was respected. Not pursuing the truth about 9/11 disrespects the value of the lives of the people that died. Thinking that we’re above such things, that it could happen in other countries but it couldn’t here, that’s a lack of humility and that’s excessive pride. And, so not being able to see our dark side or our weaknesses is the most dangerous thing.”
Now, before you write me off as some lunatic conspiracy theorist, there’s something else in this video you need to hear: Your instinct to ignore the facts, turn away and call me a lunatic is normal, in fact, it’s expected.
Denial is a basic, psychological reponse mechanism that kicks in to protect you whenever your beliefs are challenged, and some of our greatest beliefs were shaken to the core on 9/11: The beliefs that our country protects us and keeps us safe and that America is the good guy. The evidence to the contrary was obvious before 9/11, and each year that evidence becomes more and more compelling.
Psychologists who’ve worked with victims of 9/11 report that many Americans don’t want to know the truth because they know their lives would never be the same. And many Americans refuse to believe that so many Americans could be that statnically treasonous without our knowledge. Surely, someone would have leaked the secrets and prevented this atrocity.
To honor the fallen and their survivors, and to bring healing to our country, it’s important to separate your feelings, your basic beliefs, from the actual cold, hard facts surrounding 9/11. It doesn’t matter what you want to believe. All that matters is what really happened. Without acknowleding the truth, all of the deaths related to 9/11, including all the deaths in the ensuing War on Terrorism, are nothing but fuel for the war machine.
Regardless of the alphabet soup of letters or the official looking seal you see on the cover, the “official” account of the events of 9/11 are a cleverly-crafted fairytale. And, like all good fairytales, this one was woven with a lesson, in mind: There are evil terrorists lurking around every corner. You’re not smart enough to recognize these treacherous trolls and defend yourself. Therefore, we, the United States Government, will step in on your behalf, rid the world of evil, and bring order out of chaos.
In reality, this official account was presented in such a way that it justified the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, wars which resulted in the deaths of more than 6,000 Americans soldiers and millions of people in those countries. At the same time, the official account enabled the United States government to limit your civil liberties, liberties which were, and still are, guaranteed by the American Constitution.
Let’s begin dissecting this fairytale by taking a look at Osama Bin Laden. If we’re to believe the official reports, he’s the man who master-minded the entire tragedy. Capturing Osama Bin Laden was our whole reason for entering into war with Afghanistan.
“The explicit and declared motive of the [Afghanistan] war was to compel the Taliban to turn over to the United States the people who they accused of having been involved in World Trade Center and Pentagon terrorist acts. The Taliban…they requested evidence…and the Bush administration refused to provide any,” the 81-year-old senior academic made the remarks on Press TV’s program a Simple Question.”
President Bush stated on more than one occasion that there was evidence that Osama Bin Laden was behind the attacks, so it would make sense that Bin Laden should have been included on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted List. But he wasn’t. At least, not for the 9/11 attacks.
Bin Laden was on the list because of evidence of his involvement in the 1998 bomBings of U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya. But there’s no mention of him in connection with the 1993 WTC bomBing or the attacks on the USS Cole or the 9/11 attacks. Why? Because there was no evidence to confirm suspicions and convince a prosecutor to pursue the case in court.
On more than one occasion the Taliban offered to turn Bin Laden over to a neutral third-party, if, and only if, President Bush could provide evidence of Bin Laden’s involvement. Bush could never supply that evidence, nor would he back down.
There was no significant evidence that Osama Bin Laden was behind the attacks, but because our government said there was, that was enough for the American people to get behind the war machine and fire up the engine. We trusted our leaders. After all, “how could so many Americans be that satanically evil without our knowledge?”
But our fairytale begins long before September 11, 2001.
Between August 26 and September 11, 2001, a group of speculators, identified by the American Securities and Exchange Commission as Israeli citizens, sold “short” a list of 38 stocks that could reasonably be expected to fall in value as a result of the pending attacks. These speculators operated out of the Toronto, Canada and Frankfurt, Germany, stock exchanges and their profits were specifically stated to be “in the millions of dollars.”
As early as 1979 the U.S. was working covertly with Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. In fact, the U.S. and other western powers have continuously used Al-Quaeda to create pockets of terror around the world, moving them to Bosnia in 1992, and Kosovo in 1999.
“In other words, the US military was collaborating with Al Qaeda, which according to the Bush administration was involved in the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon. Yet, the US military was working hand in glove with “enemy number one” barely a few weeks before 9/11, and we are led to believe that the Bush administration is committed to waging a battle against Al Qaeda.”
“Following the invasion of Afghanistan, MSNBC reported that in November 2001, hundreds of Taliban and Al-Qaeda fighters were rescued from Kunduz and flown out on Pakistani air force cargo planes. This could not have possibly happened without the approval of U.S. forces who had secured the region.”
“With the U.S. now attacking targets in Pakistan under the pretext of going after the Taliban, the lineage of how this situation developed, with the U.S. moving their pawns around the globe at the most opportune times, can be clearly traced.”
“All over the Middle East and the Balkans, from Afghanistan, to Bosnia, to Serbia, to Pakistan, to Iraq and to Iran, the United States, through black budget programs, has funded and armed Sunni Al-Qaeda terrorist groups to destabilize and topple regimes targeted by the Anglo-American establishment.”
Whether they’re warring against terrorism or warring for oil rights or simply warring because war is good business, the fact is the 9/11 attacks gave the U.S. government exactly the leverage it needed to finally take control of the citizens of the United States.
We believed an evil man named Osama Bin Laden was responsible for terrorizing us on our own soil. We believed that his evil followers were lurking around every corner, looking for the opportunity to attack again. We believed that every person who wasn’t a bonafied, certified American was out to kill us, kill our children and blow up America.
So we allowed the the USA Patriot Act, signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001, and given a four-year extension by President Barack Obama on May 26, 2011. The USA Patriot Act, at it’s core, reduces the restrictions placed on law enforcement agencies’ gathering of intelligence, allowing roving wiretaps, searches of business records and surveillance of individuals suspected of terrorist-related activities not linked to terrorist groups.
The 9/11 myth doesn’t end with the death of Osama Bin Laden. Now there’s the fear that his followers will retaliate. The American people are still under threat. So, as an average American citizen you’re probably thinking, “Great! Now we can catch those nasty terrorists and put them away where they belong.” But the real targets of the USA Patriot act are people like you and me.
As long as the government can keep you believing there’s a bogey man lurking around every corner you’ll agree to be groped by the TSA before you get on a plane. You won’t mind the face-recognition software that’s being installed across America. You won’t have a problem having your kids being monitored with a micro-chip 24-hours a day. After all, it’s all in your best interest.
Eventually, you won’t have a problem doing exactly what the government tells you. You work where they tell you to work, eat what they give you to eat, and live where they tall you you can live. Sound familiar? Read “Animal Farm”, read “1984” and then read a history book and compare what’s happening to the events that led to the rise of Hitler and his regime.
If the events leading up to 9/11 are too much for you to wrap your mind around, conisder the attack itself.
Before the dust had even begun to settle, witnesses were stepping forward with reports of the sounds of bombs going of in the Twin Towers and building 7.
“High-rise buildings simply do not collapse due to fire. There has never been, until 9/11, an experience where a high-rise building that was steel-framed completely collapsed. There have been fires burn longer, in similar structures, without any collapse.”
The list of questions about the attacks could go on and on, but unless you’re ready to look at 9/11 with an open mind they’re meaningless.
On this 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, no one is asking you to believe one thing over another. But the victims – the people who died in the attacks, the people who’ve died as a result of illness or injury during rescue efforts, and the millions of people who’ve died in the manufactured war on terror – the victims cry out for us to honor them with the truth.
Abraham Lincoln said, “I am a firm believer in the people…If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring the the real facts.”
On September 11, 2001, we were pushed into a national crisis. That push came, not from a group of terrorists, but from a group of people who are feeding off our terror. And now we’re living with two kinds of fear – fear of evil men like Osama Bin Laden and his followers, and fear of the truth. The questions and the answers are all out there. Now it’s time to honor our dead by turning our attention from plaques and monuments, and focusing on the facts, instead.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

FBI begins installation of $1 billion face recognition system across America

Sept 9, 2012
Birthmarks, be damned: the FBI has officially started rolling out a state-of-the-art face recognition project that will assist in their effort to accumulate and archive information about each and every American at a cost of a billion dollars.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has reached a milestone in the development of their Next Generation Identification (NGI) program and is now implementing the intelligence database in unidentified locales across the country, New Scientist reports in an article this week. The FBI first outlined the project back in 2005, explaining to the Justice Department in an August 2006 document (.pdf) that their new system will eventually serve as an upgrade to the current Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS) that keeps track of citizens with criminal records across America .
“The NGI Program is a compilation of initiatives that will either improve or expand existing biometric identification services,” its administrator explained to the Department of Justice at the time, adding that  the project, “will accommodate increased information processing and sharing demands in support of anti-terrorism.”
“The NGI Program Office mission is to reduce terrorist and criminal activities by improving and expanding biometric identification and criminal history information services through research, evaluation and implementation of advanced technology within the IAFIS environment.”
The agency insists, “As a result of the NGI initiatives, the FBI will be able to provide services to enhance interoperability between stakeholders at all levels of government, including local, state, federal, and international partners.” In doing as such, though, the government is now going ahead with linking a database of images and personally identifiable information of anyone in their records with departments around the world thanks to technology that makes fingerprint tracking seem like kids’ stuff.
According to their 2006 report, the NGI program utilizes “specialized requirements in the Latent Services, Facial Recognition and Multi-modal Biometrics areas” that “will allow the FnewBI to establish a terrorist fingerprint identification system that is compatible with other systems; increase the accessibility and number of the IAFIS terrorist fingerprint records; and provide latent palm print search capabilities.”
Is that just all, though? During a 2010 presentation (.pdf) made by the FBI’s Biometric Center of Intelligence, the agency identified why facial recognition technology needs to be embraced. Specifically, the FBI said that the technology could be used for “Identifying subjects in public datasets,” as well as “conducting automated surveillance at lookout locations” and “tracking subject movements,” meaning NGI is more than just a database of mug shots mixed up with fingerprints — the FBI has admitted that this their intent with the technology surpasses just searching for criminals but includes spectacular surveillance capabilities. Together, it’s a system unheard of outside of science fiction.

Rob Schneider Speaks Out Against Vaccines.

You Tube
September 8, 2012

Actor, Rob Schneider talks out against vaccines, parental rights, corporate greed and AB2109.


Federal Reserve Braces for Nationwide Protests Sept 22

Reality Report
Gary Franchi
September 8, 2012 | Americans have had enough of the Federal Reserve with its Backroom Bailouts and devaluing of the US Dollar. This September 22 Americans directly affected by the FED's polices will stage Rallies for Sound Money for the 4th straight year.
Find your group at

TERROR CAMPS:The Global Agenda

TERROR CAMPS:The Global Agenda
Watch Full Length Movie Here

Libyan Violence: Globalist Plan for the Domination of Eurasia

Left-Right Paradigm and the Coming Election

More White House Propaganda... "The Unemployment Rate is Only 8.25%!!!!"

Defense Cuts Harmful to Economy or National Security?

The Obama Catholic Connection

The Globalists Plan for a Coming World Currency

Four Mega Banks Dubbed "The Four Horsemen of U.S. Banking"

New World Order Rising-Documentary

New World Order Rising-Documentary
Watch Here
Find out Why Here...

My Other Passions

My Other Passions
Aikido and Iaido