Saturday, April 17, 2010

"The Race to Divide"

Mark Matheny

Since the rise of the tea party movement, and the escalation of the socialist progression of the current administration, there has also been the increasing cries from the left of "Racist" toward the patriot movements of the right, and of libertarians and constitutionalists who have spoken against the rapid push by Obama and the democrats toward fascism - the totalitarian philosophy that glorifies the State and assigns to the State control over every aspect of national life.

Those on the left who would accuse these groups of racism of course, do this in order to discredit the patriots because the tea party movement threatens to expose their agenda, and destroy the left/right paradigm which has controlled the political parties for so long.

This "race", "racist" issue being brought forth, however, is based on error. You will hear many people say things such as: "He is bi-racial", or "They are an inter-racial couple". There are terms such as "racial prejudice", "superior race" and "different races".

When one thinks of the term "race", often what can come to mind is the idea of competition. In a competition there usually is a winner and a loser. It therefore can infer that the winner is superior,and therefore the loser is inferior.

We commonly refer to other nationalities as other "races". If therefore there are other races, does this not conjure the idea that we are in competition? And if so, would not the winner of this competition be superior to the loser?

Let's take a look at the word "race" in relation to humanity. In using the term "race" we are referring to "ethnicity". The word's etymology is from Greek, meaning people,or nation.

[Middle English, heathen, from Late Latin ethnicus, from Greek ethnikos, from ethnos, people, nation.]

It can also denote a group of people identified by a common and distinctive racial, national, religious, linguistic, or cultural background:

a.Of, relating to, or characteristic of a sizable group of people sharing a common and distinctive racial, national, religious, linguistic, or cultural heritage.

Although ethnicity can refer to differences in national, religious, linguistic, or cultural heritage - it also shows that it refers to people at its root meaning.

The word "race" however, more correctly refers to a "species". Let's therefore take a look at the definition of  the word "species".

  • Species:  spe·cies noun ; biology taxonomic group: a subdivision of a genus considered as a basic biological classification and containing individuals that resemble one another and may interbreed

In this definition of "species" it shows that a "race" or "species" can be defined as Humankind: human beings or the human race. It also shows that a "species" resembles one another, and may interbreed.

Therefore, since all ethnicities (or ethnic peoples) are of the same species, although being of different cultural heritages, they are able to interbreed among eachother. Therefore they are all of the same race, although culturally different.

In the Bible, it is written that all of humanity came from Adam. The word "Adam" in Hebrew means man, or mankind. It comes from the Hebrew word "adumah" meaning "red earth" or "ground".

"and Yahweh formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life: and man became a living being". Genesis 2:7 
"...for dust you were, and to dust you shall return" Genesis 3:19
From the word "Adam" comes the Hebrew word "dam" meaning "blood".

"And He (God) has made from one blood, all nations of men to dwell on the face of the earth,... for in Him we live, move, and have our being..." Acts 17:26,28

We have been brainwashed into using the term "race" to denote different ethnic groups in order to imply there is competition amongst the "races", and therefore one race is superior over one or more of the other races. It also denotes a winner, wherein the others must be losers. Are you starting to see to Eugenicist agenda behind this lie?

"Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself will not stand." Mathew 12:25

The left "Alinsky -ites" who want to destroy our nation are trying to do it by a "divide and conquer" tactic using the "race card" as their weapen! This also stems from Darwinism and Eugenics! Don't be fooled by those who would try to defeat us through lies and deception!
There certainly is a race to divide and conquer, so that America will fall and out of its ashes rise a "New World Order" - but just remember that we are all in a race, called the Human Race! And united under the cause of Freedom we can prevail!!!!

Mark Matheny is Administrator and editor of SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!!!. He is a Veteran and has worked as an Operation Manager in Private security covering both private and government contracts. He is proficient in several forms of martial arts, including Aikido, Karate and Kungfu. He currently works in management for a major super retail company. He is married with 6 children and 1 nephew, and enjoys reading the Bible and studying biblical prophecy.

Friday, April 16, 2010

Tax Deadline becomesTea Party Day

Thursday, April 15, 2010

The Coming Revolution and the Defeat of the Fed and the NEW WORLD ORDER!!

This is a picture of what may come soon! The rising of the people who will End the Fed, and defeat the New World Order!!!

Markets could be derailed again, warns Soros

Apr 14, 2010 07:11 EDT
Railway porter-turned-billionaire financier George Soros delivered a stark warning last night that the financial world is on the wrong track and that we may be hurtling towards an even bigger boom and bust than in the credit crisis.

The man who ‘broke’ the Bank of England (and who is still able to earn a cool $3.3 bln in a year) said the same strategy of borrowing and spending that had
got us out of the Asian crisis could shunt us towards another crisis unless tough lessons are learned.

Soros, who worked as a porter to pay for his studies at the London School of Economics after emigrating from Hungary, warned us to heed the lesson that modern economics had got it wrong and that markets are not inherently stable.

“The success in bailing out the system on the previous occasion led to a superbubble, except that in 2008 we used the same methods,” he told a meeting hosted by The Economist at the City of London’s modern and impressive Haberdashers’ Hall.

“Unless we learn the lessons, that markets are inherently unstable and that stability needs to the objective of public policy, we are facing a yet larger bubble.

“We have added to the leverage by replacing private credit with sovereign credit and increasing national debt by a significant amount.”

One crumb of comfort could be the 10-year period between the 1998 Asian crisis and the 2008 credit crisis. If the pattern is repeated, it should at least mean we have another 8 years to go before the next crash…

Tea Party Tax Day Rally

Thursday, April 15, 2010

5:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m.

Columbus Ohio
Ohio State House West Lawn
77 South High Street

Event Contact Person
Columbus Tea Party None

Find more information at:

TIME Magazine Lists Flouride as "Environmental Toxin"

Flouride -a known toxin-  is currently in toothpaste
and our water supply
Mark Matheny

A report from lists among other household Items - Flouride- as an "Environmental Toxin". The article starts out, saying:
Chemicals in plastics and other products seem harmless, but mounting evidence links them to health problems — and Washington lacks the power to protect us

Of course, activists and scientists have for years been aware of Flouride's toxicity, but propaganda and Big Pharma have sought to keep these facts from the general public by showing flouride in a favorable light through the controlled media.

The article went on to say that "Government studies support current fluoride levels in tap water, but studies on long-term exposure and cancers are ongoing".

What It Is: A form of the basic element fluorine

Found In: Toothpaste, tap water

Health Hazards: Neurotoxic and potentially tumorigenic if swallowed; the American Dental Association advises that children under 2 not use fluoride toothpaste

What You Should Know: Government studies support current fluoride levels in tap water, but studies on long-term exposure and cancers are ongoing

So, What are the lethal levels for humans?

As of April 7, 1997, the United States FDA (Food & Drug Administration) required that all fluoride toothpastes sold in the U.S. carry the following poison warning:

WARNING: Keep out of reach of children under 6 years of age. If you accidentally swallow more than used for brushing, seek professional help or contact a poison control center immediately.

Potentially fatal dose = 5 mg of fluoride per kg of bodyweight.

Ingestion of fluoride can produce gastrointestinal discomfort at doses at least 15 to 20 times lower (0.2–0.3 mg/kg) than lethal doses. [7][8] A 2-year-old, for example, may experience gastrointestinal distress upon ingesting sufficient amounts of flavored toothpaste. Between 1989 and 1994, over 628 people—mostly children—were treated after ingesting too much fluoride from their toothpaste. Gastrointestinal symptoms appear to be the most common problem reported. [9]

In 1986 the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established a maximum contaminant level (MCL) for fluoride at a concentration of 4 milligrams per litre (mg/L), which is the legal limit of natural fluoride allowed in the water. In 2006, a 12-person committee of the US National Research Council (NRC) reviewed the health risks associated with fluoride consumption[12] and unanimously concluded that the maximum contaminant level of 4 mg/L should be lowered. The EPA has yet to act on the NRC's recommendation.[13][14] The limit was previously 1.4 – 2.4 mg/L, but it was raised to 4 mg/L in 1985.[15]

Excessive flouride consumption in studies has been shown to be the culprit in the following;
  • A weakening of bones, leading to an increase in hip and wrist fracture
  • Adverse effects on the kidneys
  • possible liver damage
  • Chromosomal damage and interference with DNA repair
  • a correlation between increased fluoride and low IQ
  • suppressive effects on the thyroid

While it is refreshing to see the truth about flouride being published in the mainstream media, it is disappointing to see, that when most people are told about the devastating effects of flouride in our drinking water, toothpaste, and other household items - they ignore the facts, or even categorize these facts as just another "Conspiracy theory".

Read more:,28804,1976909_1976895_1976898,00.html#ixzz0l9fAAVGu,29569,1976909,00.html#ixzz0l9ah3iSS

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Ohio GOP bracing for tea-party impact
Associated Press


As Ohio’s tea party movement celebrates its first birthday, mainstream candidates are trying to read the tea leaves for how the angry surge will impact them at the polls.

Leaders of the loosely allied tea party or liberty groups around the state are increasingly on record saying their frustration with government has spanned both the Republican Bush and Democratic Obama administrations. They argue that advocating a return to the values laid out in America’s Constitution and Bill of Rights isn’t partisan. Hefty government-backed social programs and Wall Street bailouts are equally within their sights.

Yet, in statewide races, the movement’s influence is being felt almost exclusively on Republican candidates.

The Ohio Democratic Party has fanned the flames of dissent among conservatives by buying Facebook ads targeting tea-party voters with keywords such as “Glenn Beck,” “912 Project” or “The O’Reilly Factor.” An early example suggested Republican gubernatorial candidate John Kasich has contradicted himself on whether the state should take federal-stimulus dollars.

Ohio State University political science professor Paul Beck said the tea party is bringing economic conservatism back to center stage — and that puts Republicans who espouse fiscal discipline in the hot seat.

“Ohio, like the rest of the nation, is reacting to what it sees as unbridled government spending engaged in by both Democrats and Republicans,” he said. “What they’re wanting to do is push the Republicans in a much more conservative direction on economic issues than they have been in the last 10 years.”

Read the entire article

Poll: Tea Party backers wealthier, educated

And they're driven by ideology, not economic anxiety, survey shows


New York Times
updated 6:31 p.m. CT, Wed., April 14, 2010

NEW YORK - Tea party supporters are wealthier and more well-educated than the general public, tend to be Republican, white, male, and married, and their strong opposition to the Obama administration is more rooted in political ideology than anxiety about their personal economic situation, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.

The 18 percent of Americans who identify themselves as Tea Party supporters look like Republicans in many ways, but they hold more conservative views on a range of issues and tend to be older than Republicans generally. They are also more likely than Republicans as a whole to describe themselves as “very conservative” and President Obama as “very liberal.”

And while most Republicans say they are “dissatisfied” with Washington, Tea Party supporters are more likely to classify themselves as “angry.”

Read the entire story

CPAC 2010 – Interview with Jerome Corsi

Interview from Feb. 19, 2010 - CPAC Conference.
Author and journalist Jerome Corsi has been central to exposing efforts during the Bush administration to create a North American Union and has subsequently earned notice for his investigation of President Obama’s citizenship. In an exclusive interview from the CPAC 2010 conference, Liberty News Network Senior Correspondent William F. Jasper talks to Corsi about these issues and more.

Newsweek: Oath Keepers Are Extremists
By Evan Thomas and Eve Conant

Published Apr 9, 2010

Editor's Note: This is just preparatory propaganda setting the stage for all-out Police State control. Of course I do not agree that the Oath Keepers organization is an "extremist group". I merely posted this to show the desparation at which the left will go to defame Patriotic Groups and Americans who go against socialism and tyranny.

From the magazine issue dated Apr 19, 2010Stewart Rhodes does not seem like an extremist. He is a graduate of Yale Law School and a former U.S. Army paratrooper and congressional staffer. He is not at all secretive. In February he was sitting at a table at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at a fancy downtown hotel in Washington, handing out fliers and selling T shirts for his organization, the Oath Keepers. Rhodes says he has 6,000 dues-paying members, active and retired police and military, who promise never to take orders to disarm U.S. citizens or herd them into concentration camps. Rhodes told a NEWSWEEK reporter, "We're not a militia." Oath Keepers do not run around the woods on the weekend shooting weapons or threatening the violent overthrow of the government. Their oath is to uphold the Constitution and defend the American people from dictatorship.

But by conjuring up the specter of revolution—or counterrevolution—is Rhodes adding to the threat of real violence? Oath Keepers are "a particularly worrisome example of the 'patriot' revival," according to Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which monitors hate speech and extremist organizations. "Patriot" groups—described by the SPLC as outfits "that see the federal government as part of a plot to impose 'one-world government' on liberty-loving Americans"—are "roaring back" after years out of the limelight, according to Potok. Notorious in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, the patriot groups seemed to fade away under the shadow of 9/11, but hard times and the nation's first African-American president seem to have brought about a revival—from 149 groups in 2008 to 512 (127 of them militias) in 2009, according to the SPLC.

Read the entire article

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Police beating College Students Caught on Camera

Lieberman: U.S. Should Attack Iran's Nuclear Program If All Else Fails
March 12,2010

Why Obama Can't Move the Health-Care Numbers

For every voter who strongly favors the plan, two are strongly opposed.

MARCH 9, 2010, 10:07 P.M. ET 

One of the more amazing aspects of the health-care debate is how steady public opinion has remained. Despite repeated and intense sales efforts by the president and his allies in Congress, most Americans consistently oppose the plan that has become the centerpiece of this legislative season.

In 15 consecutive Rasmussen Reports polls conducted over the past four months, the percentage of Americans that oppose the plan has stayed between 52% and 58%. The number in favor has held steady between 38% and 44%.

The dynamics of the numbers have remained constant as well. Democratic voters strongly support the plan while Republicans and unaffiliated voters oppose it. Senior citizens—the people who use the health-care system more than anybody else and who vote more than anybody else in midterm elections—are more opposed to the plan than younger voters. For every person who strongly favors it, two are strongly opposed.

Read the entire story

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Jason Mattera: U.S. Youth 'Brainwashed' for Obama

Thursday, 08 Apr 2010 07:09 PM

By: Jim Meyers

Conservative activist Jason Mattera tells Newsmax that young Americans have been “brainwashed” into supporting President Barack Obama even though his policies are a “torpedo” aimed at their futures.

Mattera, author of the book “Obama Zombies: How the Liberal Machine Brainwashed My Generation,” also says conservatives should learn from the Obama team’s tactics during the 2008 campaign and reach out to young people — or risk losing an entire generation of young voters.

Mattera is known for his “ambush videos” of Democratic leaders and young liberals. He has served as media spokesman at Young America’s Foundation, appeared on cable news programs including Bill O’Reilly’s show on Fox News, and was recently named editor at Human Events magazine.

Asked about his assertion that the Obama team brainwashed young Americans, Mattera says: “A lobotomy took place in 2008. John McCain lost the youth vote by almost 40 points. That was the biggest age demographic shift in presidential history.

Read the rest of the story here.

Congress Calls on Obama for Action Against Iran

A letter to President Barack Obama from two unlikely congressional allies urging strong action against Iran has gained wide support on both sides of the aisle.

The letter was originally signed by Democratic Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. of Illinois and House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence of Indiana and circulated in late March.

The letter to the president begins, “We are writing you out of our concern that Iran is growing ever closer to nuclear weapons capability, a fact demanding immediate action on the part of the United States . . .

“Iran’s nuclear weapons program represents a severe threat to American national interests. Iran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons could lead to the proliferation of these weapons throughout the Middle East and beyond, destabilizing the global non-proliferation regime and greatly increasing the likelihood of such weapons falling into the hands of terrorists . . .

“It would undercut prospects for peace between Israel and her neighbors, with emboldened Iranian surrogates enjoying the strategic backing of an Iranian nuclear umbrella. And it would pose an existential threat to the State of Israel . . .

“Mr. President, you have stated this issue is a priority for your administration. You have attempted to engage the Iranian regime for over a year. You have gone to the United Nations Security Council in an effort to impose tough new sanctions on Iran. But time is not on our side . . .

“Accordingly, we urge you today to reaffirm boldly and unambiguously that the U.S. can and will prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capability. We call on you to fulfill your June 2008 pledge that you would do ‘everything in my power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.’

“Certainly, one way to begin would be to reverse the practice under which the U.S. government has awarded at least $107 billion over the past decade in federal contracts to companies investing in or doing business in Iran. We urge you to join with those allies who are prepared for action to immediately impose crippling sanctions on Iran . . .

“We can do this by imposing punishing measures on the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, rocking Iran’s banking system, and dramatically impacting Iran’s ability to import or refine petroleum.”

In December, the House approved a measure enabling Obama to ban foreign firms that supply Iran with refined petroleum from doing business in the U.S. The Senate passed its own version of sanctions targeting Iran’s energy sector on Jan. 28.

But as the Insider Report disclosed two weeks ago, Democratic leaders have not taken steps to reconcile slight differences in the House and Senate bills, reportedly because the Obama administration has asked them to hold off so he can maintain “flexibility” in dealing with other countries in confronting Iran.

The letter from Reps. Jackson and Pence concludes:
“We urge you to move rapidly to implement your existing authority on Iran and the legislation we send you, and to galvanize the international community for immediate, devastating steps. The hour is late. Now is the time for action.”

The letter quickly gained support from other members of Congress, and by April 1, 76 Democrats and 138 Republicans had signed on to the letter.

“The broad, bipartisan backing reflects a clear-eyed, rock-ribbed commitment in Congress to do what is necessary now to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons capability,” Rep. Jackson told The Hill newspaper.

Another letter with bipartisan congressional support was sent to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last month, stressing the importance of American-Israeli relations.

“We are writing to reaffirm our commitment to the unbreakable bond that exists between our country and the State of Israel and to express to you our deep concern over recent tension,” the letter begins.

Referring to the announcement during Vice President Joe Biden’s recent visit to Israel that Israel would build 1,600 new housing units in East Jerusalem, the signees state: “We are reassured that Prime Minister Netanyahu’s commitment to put in place new procedures will ensure that such surprises, however unintended, will not recur.”

The letter, dated March 19, was signed by three Democrats — House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland; Howard Berman of California, chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs; and Gary Ackerman of New York, chairman of the Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia.

Three Republicans also signed the letter: Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia; Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, the ranking Republican member on the Committee on Foreign Affairs; and Dan Burton of Indiana, ranking Republican member on the Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia.

The letter to Clinton declares: “We are concerned that the highly publicized tensions in the relationship will not advance the interests the U.S. and Israel share. Above all, we must remain focused on the threat posed by the Iranian nuclear weapons program to Middle East peace and stability.”

Ohio official tells residents to ‘arm themselves’ amid police cuts

TERROR CAMPS:The Global Agenda

TERROR CAMPS:The Global Agenda
Watch Full Length Movie Here

Libyan Violence: Globalist Plan for the Domination of Eurasia

Left-Right Paradigm and the Coming Election

More White House Propaganda... "The Unemployment Rate is Only 8.25%!!!!"

Defense Cuts Harmful to Economy or National Security?

The Obama Catholic Connection

The Globalists Plan for a Coming World Currency

Four Mega Banks Dubbed "The Four Horsemen of U.S. Banking"

New World Order Rising-Documentary

New World Order Rising-Documentary
Watch Here
Find out Why Here...

My Other Passions

My Other Passions
Aikido and Iaido