Gun Control Laws In Libya Left U.S. Compound Unarmed and Unprepared for Attack

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!!!
Mark Matheny
January 14, 2013

If you are aware at all of the events transpiring recently in the news with the constant bombardment of propaganda regarding the danger of "assault" weapons and the need for control, then you also know that there are attempts by our own government to push severe gun control measures to destroy our 2nd amendment rights.

Recently disclosed, has come information that the Embassy Attack was partly successful due to the fact that severe gun control policies in Libya by the newly installed government left the Embassy vulnerable. This is from CNS News which stated:
 The gun control policies of the post-Gaddafi government in Libya delayed the arming of bodyguards for U.S. diplomats in that country and left the local guard force hired to watch over the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi unarmed, according to internal State Department memos and written testimony by the State Department officer who was in charge of the department’s security in Libya until six weeks before the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attacks.
Of course the government that was in power during the attack is the Al queada-CIA sponsored Terrorist organization that supposedly liberated the Libyan people from the dictator Moanmar Gaddafi. It is clear to see that gun control, idealistically meant to protect the public, is in fact usually the reason behind such successful attacks by criminals and terrorists organizations.

The CNS News article then goes on to show that because of the gun control policies, the private security details that were hired from the local citizens of Libya to guard American officials and the Embassy were unarmed! :

“Our long term security plan in Libya was to recruit and deploy an armed, locally hired Libyan bodyguard unit,” State Department Regional Security Officer Eric Nordstrom told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee in written testimony.“However, because of Libyan political sensitivities, armed private security companies were not allowed to operate in Libya,” Nordstrom said in his testimony submitted on Oct. 10. “Therefore, our existing, uniformed static local guard force, both in Tripoli and Benghazi were unarmed, similar to our static local guard forces at many posts around the world. Their job was to observe, report, and alert armed host nation security, and armed DS agents on-site.”

You can read the entire CNS News report here.

The Obama administration is pushing for assault weapons bans here in the U.S. as part of a bigger United Nations plan to disarm nations around the world, not just the United States. The current government in Libya was put in power by the CIA and Obama administration, and are the same thugs who have passed gun control measures in Libya that allowed for the attacks on the Embassy to be successful! Think about it. Now that Obama has successfully usurped the White House for another 4 years through voter fraud and Union intimidation and contributions from elites that are hell-bent on creating their New World Order, he is now determined to disarm the American people in order to continue the destruction of the middle class, and the systematic enslavement of our society which is under the shackles of unemployment, food stamp dependency, and indentured servitude to the Federal Reserve Banking Criminal Cartel.

The shootings happening across the country are being exploited in order to use the propaganda tool of fear in  order to demonize guns in the hands of citizens. The use of the word "assault weapon" is also meant to target what types of weapons can be taken from the public. An assault weapon is more correctly any rifle-type weapon that can fire "automatic". In other words a rapid fire type weapon. Single fire rifles, no matter how they may look, are NOT assault weapons! They are simply rifles. It doesn't matter what they look like. The propaganda being pushed by our traitorous media is that basically all rifle type weapons are dangerous!

Obama has stated that so-called "assault" weapons should not be allowed on the streets of America, but only in the hands of armies. The reason he and all Elites think this way is because they do not want their slaves to have the ability to resist the tyranny they are bringing upon our nation!

It is important to defend the 2nd Amendment because it is what keeps our nation from succumbing to a tyrannical government! Here are what some of the founding fathers had to say concerning our right to keep and bear arms:

*"I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."George MasonCo-author of the Second Amendmentduring Virginia's Convention to Ratify the Constitution, 1788
 "The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full posession of them."Zachariah JohnsonElliot's Debates, vol. 3 "The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution."
"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; …"Samuel Adamsquoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State"
 "Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence … from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurences and tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable … the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere restrains evil interference — they deserve a place of honor with all that's good."George WashingtonFirst President of the United States
 "Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?"
Patrick HenryAmerican Patriot
 *From http://cap-n-ball.com/fathers.htm

Think about what the Founding Fathers said, and now see what murderous tyrants in history thought of its' people having firearms:

“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms.  History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing.  Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty.   So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.”- Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942
Under Hitler, Nazi Germany implemented strict gun control laws beginning in 1938. As a result, millions of Jews, Polish and other ethnic groups were murdered from 1939 to 1945. Only those partisan militia groups that could arm themselves were able to resist and defend themselves.

 “If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves.”- Joseph Stalin
When the Soviet Union began strict gun control measures in 1929, the result lead to approximately 20 million murders by the tyrannical regime of those the State considered "dissidents". The slaughters continued up until 1953. More recent investigations have discovered the murderous death toll may be as high as 61,911,000.

 “The measures adopted to restore public order are: First of all, the elimination of the so-called subversive elements. … They were elements of disorder and subversion.  On the morrow of each conflict I gave the categorical order to confiscate the largest possible number of weapons of every sort and kind.  This confiscation, which continues with the utmost energy, has given satisfactory results.”- Benito Mussolini, address to the Italian Senate, 1931 
 “All political power comes from the barrel of a gun.  The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.”- Mao Tze Tung, Nov 6 1938
China established gun control laws in beginning in 1935. Under the dictator Mao Tze Tung,  10,076,000 political dissidents, unable to defend themselves due to severe gun control laws, were rounded up and exterminated in Kuomintang China, and by 1987 another 35,236,000 exterminations were carried out under the Communists.



“I did not join the resistance movement to kill people, [but] to kill the nation. Look at me now. Am I a savage person? My conscience is clear.”
- Pol Pot 
Cambodia established gun control in 1956.  Between 1975 and 19793, 2,035,000 “educated” people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
During the short four years of its rule in Cambodia, Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge government murdered over 31 percent of the entire Cambodian population.

“Armas para que? (“Guns, for what?”)”A response to Cuban citizens who said the people might need to keep their guns, after Castro announced strict gun control in Cuba.- Fidel Castro
It is clear to see why gun control is being pushed by an out of control government here in our country.

They don't want to control  guns.
They want to control people.

No comments: