Seven states and D.C. pick candidates in Tuesday's primary finale
 |
Delaware GOP Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell is backed by the Tea Party Express.
|
msnbc.com staff and news service reports
O'Donnell defeated nine-term Rep. Mike Castle, a fixture in Delaware politics for a generation and a political moderate. Republican Party officials, who had touted him as their only hope for winning the seat in the fall, made clear as the votes were being counted they would not provide O'Donnell funding against Democrat Chris Coons if she won the primary.
With unemployment high and President Barack Obama's popularity below 50 percent, Republicans said a run of hotly contested primaries this spring and summer reflected voter enthusiasm that will serve the party well in the fall. The GOP needs to gain 40 seats to take the House and 10 for control of the Senate.
3 comments:
There will be no profanity used by me. But this maybe profane. But I got your article and your name off of the Infowars.com comment post as I read your article about the Tea Party.
It was really interesting. Describing the inner works of the Tea Party with the victory for Christine O'Donnell, and than in the comment section there was Hang55 and his comment on your article of that- that stated how Christine is supported seemingly by the Tea Party Express, for how her victory came seemingly out of nowhere over Mike Castle. You commented to the fact that Hang55 was kind of causing the wrong kind of dissent by his attitude. But I agree with hang55 on that or any than skepticism; as skepticism doesn't mean a negative drift that is being caused. It is just the reality.
As' Hang55 Nor I, Michael James Young, am posting articles on Infowars in the means of informing others. But you are one who is posting articles on Infowars.com. Me' I am just a respondent. I liked your article and writing. I just don't like the insinuation that there has to be kind of a blind ignorance and blind walk of faith when one has an opinion. The battle of Politics is best played in the area of 3 feet by 3 feet, in that area of ourselves where we are individuals in thought. As' all battles are won locally.
Skepticism is a great weapon to have. Skepticism is not some negative slur nor profanity nor profane. It is just means of taking awhile to make decisions by using discernment while doing that right.
Anyway,
Keep up the good fight that you are doing. But just cause a guy or girl disagrees with you. There is no need to be hostile in your verbatim. Best way to answer someone is to honor them with a kind rebuke, and than state your facts. You were being kind of petty and a little turn coat yourself. Show people respect, brother. I respect you out here, man.
Respect us.
thanks and God Bless, Michael James Young
This is Michael James Young who made a comment on your commenting about hang55 and his or her comment there on Infowars for your article on the Tea Party movement and Christine O'Donnell and her victory there in primary.
My name tag is Defiled Nation if you want to retort back at all on Infowars.com. It is only fair. I just couldn't remember my google account user name as that is always a hassle with every site wanting you to have a dang user name of some dang kind. So I chose anonymous and my name and all of that.
Thanks
Thanks for your comment. here is the other comment you sent me:
"There will be no profanity used by me. But this maybe profane. But I got your article and your name off of the Infowars.com comment post as I read your article about the Tea Party. It was really interesting. Describing the inner works of the Tea Party with the victory for Christine O'Donnell, and than in the comment section there was Hang55 and his comment on your article of that- that stated how Christine is supported seemingly by the Tea Party Express, for how her victory came seemingly out of nowhere over Mike Castle. You commented to the fact that Hang55 was kind of causing the wrong kind of dissent by his attitude. But I agree with hang55 on that or any than skepticism; as skepticism doesn't mean a negative drift that is being caused. It is just the reality. As' Hang55 Nor I, Michael James Young, am posting articles on Infowars in the means of informing others. But you are one who is posting articles on Infowars.com. Me' I am just a respondent. I liked your article and writing. I just don't like the insinuation that there has to be kind of a blind ignorance and blind walk of faith when one has an opinion. The battle of Politics is best played in the area of 3 feet by 3 feet, in that area of ourselves where we are individuals in thought. As' all battles are won locally. Skepticism is a great weapon to have. Skepticism is not some negative slur nor profanity nor profane. It is just means of taking awhile to make decisions by using discernment while doing that right. Anyway, Keep up the good fight that you are doing. But just cause a guy or girl disagrees with you. There is no need to be hostile in your verbatim. Best way to answer someone is to honor them with a kind rebuke, and than state your facts. You were being kind of petty and a little turn coat yourself. Show people respect, brother. I respect you out here, man. Respect us. thanks and God Bless, Michael James Young"
If I sounded as though I were rude, It wasn't my intent. Please continue to visit my site and appreciate the criticism. I am always seeking to be a better person. My goal is only to get out information that needs to be told, and to serve The Almighty. May the Holy One, Yahweh, Bless you as well my friend.
Post a Comment