Breaking News: Armed militia, incl. Bundy bros, occupy forest reserve HQ in Oregon, call ‘US patriots’ to arms

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!!! News

January 3, 2016
Mark Matheny

Breaking News




Recently a group of approximately 150 militiamen have seized control of a Federal building in Oregon. According to the Conservative Tribune,

A militia just took over a federal building in Oregon.  Three of the 150 militia members are sons of notorious Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy.They are occupying the headquarters building at the Malhuer National Wildlife Building to keep local ranchers our of prison.  The building is 50 miles outside of Burns, Oregon.The militia is reportedly heavily armed.The militia members are upset that 2 ranchers, Dwight and Steve Hammond, were charged under anti-terrorism laws. The Hammonds were set to report to prison on Monday.The militia believe the Hammonds were illegally prosecuted because they claim the federal government does not have authority at the county level.According to the Washington Examiner, Ammon Bundy said “This facility has been the tool to do all the tyranny that has been placed upon the Hammonds.”Cliven Bundy gained national popularity among patriots who rejected the growing overreach of Barack Obama’s federal government.  He dug his heels in during an armed standoff with federal officials from the Bureau of Land Management.Early Saturday, the Bundy family and 300 protesters marched through Burns before taking over the federal refuge.An unnamed investigative reporter claimed that Ammon Bundy intends to use the refuge as a headquarters for the militia for the foreseeable future.Bundy also has issues a call to sympathetic citizens to join in his efforts and come to the area, according to the Washington Examiner.Ammon Bundy has not yet used any violence. But he said say he will not rule it out if law enforcement officials try to intervene.Bundy claims in the video above, which he posted on December 31, 2015 that God told him to go to Oregon.We fully support the right of patriots to protest and fight injustice but we hope that any issues can be resolved without violence or bloodshed.

Just about a year ago the Bundy Family, along with hundreds of militia and Patriot groups stood up again the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) in open defiance of what the Bundy family felt was unjust taxation of land his cattle had been grazing on.

The stand off was tense and came close to commencing until the BLM backed off at that time.

All You Need To Know About Obama’s Coming Gun Grab

Whistleblower Exposes CA Shooting Cover up – Guess Who It Implicates

Mass Shooting, 300 Shot At, 17 Wounded, Media Silent. Why?

Mass Shootings Have Skyrocketed 700% Under Obama – Why?

Obama Wants Americans Disarmed – Because That’s What Executioners Do

Sheriff Arpaio Calls for Armed Citizens to Take Action

Texas Sheriff Defies Obama: ‘If You Try to Disarm Us,’ a ‘Revolution’ is Coming

Video: “Mr. President: Guns Don’t Become Radicalized and Kill – Terrorists Do!”

Mainstream Media Admits: Gun “Control” Equals Gun “Confiscation”

New Court Ruling Paves Way For Mass Gun Confiscation In America

Patriots Guard Home of Veteran to Stop VA From Confiscating His Guns

2nd Amendment in the Hands of the U.N. – Obama Does Believe in Guns

Veterans: Obama is Coming For Your Guns, and he Will Get Them!

Congress Won’t Pass Gun Legislation: Obama Will Start BANNING Bullets

How Will You Respond When They Come For YOUR Guns? Better Think it Through!

If They Come For Your Guns, Do You Have A Responsibility To Fight?

Michelle Obama Promises To Confiscate All Firearms Before Leaving the White House

Crime-Fighting Robots Hitting The Streets In California

Technocracy News and Trends
January 2, 2016

WRITTEN BY: SARAH BUHR JANUARY 1, 2016

TN Note: The Police State and Total Surveillance Society are joined at the hip. Automated police robots are currently only used as threat assessment and surveillance collection devices, but there will be a time when force/intervention features will be added. These robots are driven by AI, of course, and communicate everything the see, hear and think back to a central computer for analysis. This is a bad trend but one that will greatly further the aspirations of technocrats everywhere. 

The robots might one day rise up and take over, but a Palo Alto startup called Knightscope has developed a fleet of crime-fighting machinery it hopes to keep us safe.

Knightscope’s K5 security bots resemble a mix between R2D2 and a Dalek from Doctor Who – and the system behind these bots is a bit Orwellian. The K5’s have broadcasting and sophisticated monitoring capabilities to keep public spaces in check as they rove through open areas, halls and corridors for suspicious activity.

The units upload what they see to a backend security network using 360-degree high-definition and low-light infrared cameras and a built-in microphone can be used to communicate with passersby. An audio event detection system can also pick up on activities like breaking glass and send an alert to the system as well.

Malls and office buildings are also starting to employ the K5 units as security assistants. Knightscope couldn’t name names, but tells TechCrunch the robots are being used at a number of tech companies and a mall in Silicon Valley at the moment.

CEO Stacey Dean Stephens, a former law enforcement agent, came up with the idea to build a predictive network to prevent crime using robots. He and his co-founder William Li have raised close to $12 million in funding so far from Konica Minolta and others to build on the idea.

While Knightscope doesn’t think its robots will replace mall cops or security guards in the near future, the company does see them as assistants to human security teams. The startup currently rents each five-foot, 300-pound K5 unit out for $6.25 per hour (or less than minimum wage). However, teenagers or others tempted to kick or push the robots over may be shocked to find the robots can talk back to them, capture their behavior on film and alert authorities behind the scenes as well.

Read the entire article here

Putin Names United States Among Threats In New Russian Security Strategy

One America News
January 2, 2016

Russian President Vladimir Putin looks on as he delivers his annual New Year address to the nation in Moscow, Russia, December 31, 2015. REUTERS/Alexei Druzhinin/Sputnik/Kremlin

MOSCOW (Reuters) – A new appraisal names the United States as one of the threats to Russia’s national security for the first time, a sign of how relations with the west have deteriorated in recent years.

The document, “About the Strategy of National Security of Russian Federation”, was signed by President Vladimir Putin on New Year’s Eve. It replaces a 2009 version, endorsed by then- President Dmitry Medvedev, the current prime minister, which mentioned neither the United States not NATO.

It says Russia has managed to heighten its role in solving global problems and international conflicts. That heightened role has caused a reaction by the West, it says.

“The strengthening of Russia happens against the background of new threats to the national security, which has complex and interrelated nature,” the document says.

Conducting an independent policy, “both international and domestic” has caused “counteraction from the USA and its allies, which are striving to retain their dominance in global affairs.”

That in turn is likely to lead to “political, economical, military and informational pressure” on Russia, the document says.”

Relations between Russia and the West reached a low after Russian forces annexed the Crimean peninsula from Ukraine in March 2014, after protests in Ukraine forced its pro-Moscow president to flee to Russia.

Since then, the West has accused Russia of aiding insurgents in eastern Ukraine. Moscow denies actively assisting the rebels.

The United States and the European Union have since imposed wide-ranging sanctions against Russian individuals and companies. Moscow has reacted by restricting food and other goods from the EU.

The document says that the United States and the EU have supported an “anti-constitutional coup d’etat in Ukraine”, which led to a deep divide in Ukrainian society and a military conflict.

It also names the expansion of NATO as a threat to Russia’s national security and said that the United States has expanded its network of military-biological laboratories in neighboring to Russia countries.

The document, which serves as a basis for planning strategy related to national security by different state bodies, does not mention Syria. On Sept. 30, Russia began air strikes against anti-government rebels opposed to the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, a Russian ally.

(Reporting by Vladimir Soldatkin)

Obama to Announce New Gun Controls by Executive Order Next Week

The New American
January 2, 2016

With time running out for his presidency, President Obamais hurrying to issue another executive order further infringing on Americans’ Second Amendment-guaranteed rights.

It’s taken longer than expected, as the Obama administration and its friends in the gun-control movement have had to work around existing law and find areas where they can impose those additional restrictions without having to go to Congress for approval. As White House spokesman Eric Schultz explained, “It’s complicated. That’s why it’s taken some time for our policy folks, our lawyers and our experts to work through this and see what’s possible." He added. "That is why [the president] has asked his team to scrub existing legal authorities to see if there’s any additional action we can take administratively."

In other words, constitutional restrictions and limitations aren’t to be enforced but are instead to be circumvented in order to advance the president’s unconstitutional gun-control agenda. Put simply, Obama’s oath of office means nothing when it conflicts with that agenda.

According to Politico, the president’s announcement, expected next week, will contain at least two additional infringements: requiring stolen guns to be reported to the ATF, and broadening the definition of who must have a federal license (Federal Firearms License or FFL) to sell firearms.

It’s the second infringement that’s going to cause the most heartburn among law-abiding gun owners. Present law requires all citizens who are “engaged in the business” of selling guns with the “principal objective of livelihood and profit” to pay a fee, complete a rigorous and invasive application that includes a photograph and fingerprints, and undergo background checks in order to do so.

But the president’s lawyers have decided that “engaged in the business” is far too broad, and so Obama will likely announce next week that anyone selling more than 25 guns in a year — or selling a gun in its original packaging, or hoarding more than a certain number of firearms, or selling a gun within 30 days of original purchase — will have to obtain an FFL. After the government has granted its approval, the new licensee would then be required to do a background check on every person he sells a gun to. In addition he’ll be forced to undergo audits from ATF agents dropping in unannounced to check his paperwork.

There are so many problems with this proposed requirement that one scarcely knows where to begin. Aside from it being another infringement of a right guaranteed under the Second Amendment, who would line up, raise their hand, and plead with the ATF for permission to buy and sell firearms?

There are other problems. The ATF would be the agency in charge of doing the administrative work for an estimated 100,000 new gun dealers who would be forced to turn their hobby into a business. As Lawrence Keane, general counsel for the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), put it,

[Obama’s new expected executive order] will create an administrative problem for the ATF in the sense that their budget does not provide for them to handle some huge increase in the volume of FFLs.

If the ATF now has to manage [another] 100,000 individuals [currently the ATF is tracking about 130,000 FFLs], or whatever the number is, who have to get a license, that’s going to divert resources that the ATF needs to be servicing the industry, and it takes money away from ATF’s ability to do its law enforcement duties.

That, of course isn’t really a problem. All the ATF has to do is plead with Congress for more money for its increased duties, as the IRS did when Congress granted that agency some $200 million in new funds.

Read the entire article

HILLARY SAYS SHE LIED TO BENGHAZI FAMILIES DUE TO “FOG OF WAR”… DONALD TRUMP RESPONDS

Gateway Pundit
January 2, 2016

In early December Hillary Clinton told ABC liberal hack and friend George Stephanopoulos she didn’t lie when she told the Benghazi families that the attack was in response to the film.
She told “This Week” viewers she suffered from a military phenomenon know as the ‘fog of war’


A majority of Americans question her honesty.

On New Year’s Day Donald Trump let Hillary have it.

“No fog of war is allowed in the White House, Hillary. Vote Trump”

See the full article here

SAN BERNARDINO FALSE FLAG: MULTIPLE WITNESSES REPORTED THREE WHITE MEN SHOOTING

Infowars News
December 7, 2015

Now that the government’s narrative on the San Bernardino shooting has been put into place by the corporate media previous eyewitness reports contradicting the official storyline will be assigned to the memory hole.

As the event unfolded last week early reports indicated there were three people involved in the shooting.

“The hunt for one to three suspects was taking place near a San Bernardino center where as many as 20 people were shot Wednesday, authorities said,” Fox News in Sacramento reported an hour after shots rang out at the Inland Regional Center, a facility for people with developmental disabilities.

Read the entire article

MICHIGAN, ALABAMA, TEXAS, ARKANSAS REFUSE TO ACCEPT SYRIAN REFUGEES IN WAKE OF PARIS ATTACKS

ABC News
November 17, 2015

Michigan, Alabama, Texas and Arkansas have become the first states in the country to refuse to take in Syrian refugees amid heightened security concerns following Friday’s terrorist attacks in Paris.

Govs. Rick Snyder of Michigan, Robert Bentley of Alabama, Greg Abbott of Texas, and Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas said in separate statements Sunday and today that their states would not be relocating refugees from the war-torn country until the U.S. Department of Homeland Security fully reviewed its screening procedures.

“Michigan is a welcoming state and we are proud of our rich history of immigration,” Snyder said. “But our first priority is protecting the safety of our residents.”

Nearly 130 people died in the coordinated attacks in Paris, and at least one of the attackers was carrying a Syrian passport, which has led authorities to consider he could have entered Europe as a refugee. The alleged mastermind of the attacks, Abdelhamid Abaaoud, is believed to have slipped into Syria this year.

Read the entire article