Obama Prepares Avalanche of Executive Orders on “Climate”

The New American
November 14, 2014

Faced with his party’s loss of the Senate and growing public skepticism surrounding man-made “global warming” theories, Obama is plotting to unleash an avalanche of unconstitutional “executive orders” to impose his “climate” agenda on the American people by decree. From signing radical “climate” deals with communist dictators and lawlessly pledging billions of taxpayer dollars for unsavory regimes, to forcing Americans to pay drastically more for electricity by ordering power plants to reduce emissions of the “gas of life” carbon dioxide, the president shows no intention of stopping — or even slowing down. Politico described the anticipated surge of executive orders as the “coming climate onslaught.” Ironically, perhaps, much of the nation is currently experiencing an onslaught of record cold. 

Of course, the GOP and its leaders in Congress have been lashing out at Obama’s “pen and phone” scheming in public — andpolls show a majority of Americans reject discredited global-warming theories advanced by the United Nations and Obama. It remains to be seen, though, whether Republican lawmakers will appropriate funds for Obama to implement his executive decrees. GOP leadership in the House and the Senate have both lambasted the administration’s “climate” plans, and alarmist Democrats were crushed in the mid-term elections despite heavy establishment backing. Still, no concrete plans to refuse funding for Obama’s schemes have been announced.

The White House, meanwhile, falsely claims the American people’s elected representatives can do nothing to stop Obama. “There are too many Republicans in Congress who even deny the basic scientific fact that climate change is occurring and something that policymakers should be concerned about [sic],” claimed White House spokesman Josh Earnest, though it was not clear whether there was actually a single lawmaker who denies that the climate changes naturally and probably always will. “So the president will use his executive action to take some additional steps.” The Constitution Obama swore to uphold, of course, grants all legislative powers to Congress and none to the executive branch.     

Read the entire article

What Catastrophe?

The Weekly Standard
January 7, 2014

MIT’s Richard Lindzen, the unalarmed climate scientist

When you first meet Richard Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology at MIT, senior fellow at the Cato Institute, leading climate “skeptic,” and all-around scourge of James Hansen, Bill McKibben, Al Gore, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and sundry other climate “alarmists,” as Lindzen calls them, you may find yourself a bit surprised. If you know Lindzen only from the way his opponents characterize him—variously, a liar, a lunatic, a charlatan, a denier, a shyster, a crazy person, corrupt—you might expect a spittle-flecked, wild-eyed loon. But in person, Lindzen cuts a rather different figure. With his gray beard, thick glasses, gentle laugh, and disarmingly soft voice, he comes across as nothing short of grandfatherly. 

THOMAS FLUHARTY

Granted, Lindzen is no shrinking violet. A pioneering climate scientist with decades at Harvard and MIT, Lindzen sees his discipline as being deeply compromised by political pressure, data fudging, out-and-out guesswork, and wholly unwarranted alarmism. In a shot across the bow of what many insist is indisputable scientific truth, Lindzen characterizes global warming as “small and .  .  . nothing to be alarmed about.” In the climate debate—on which hinge far-reaching questions of public policy—them’s fightin’ words.

In his mid-seventies, married with two sons, and now emeritus at MIT, Lindzen spends between four and six months a year at his second home in Paris. But that doesn’t mean he’s no longer in the thick of the climate controversy; he writes, gives myriad talks, participates in debates, and occasionally testifies before Congress. In an eventful life, Lindzen has made the strange journey from being a pioneer in his field and eventual IPCC coauthor to an outlier in the discipline—if not an outcast. 

Read the entire article

UN Draft Text Demands: The West will pay 'climate debt' because of its 'historical responsibility' for causing 'global warming' -- UN seeks end to wars to 'protect the climate system'

Climatdepot.com

December 9, 2011

Durban: what the media are not telling you

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley in Durban, South Africa

DURBAN, South Africa -- “No high hopes for Durban.” “Binding treaty unlikely.” “No deal this year.” Thus ran the headlines. The profiteering UN bureaucrats here think otherwise. Their plans to establish a world government paid for by the West on the pretext of dealing with the non-problem of “global warming” are now well in hand. As usual, the mainstream media have simply not reported what is in the draft text which the 194 states parties to the UN framework convention on climate change are being asked to approve.

Behind the scenes, throughout the year since Cancun, the now-permanent bureaucrats who have made highly-profitable careers out of what they lovingly call “the process” have been beavering away at what is now a 138-page document. Its catchy title is "Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention -- Update of the amalgamation of draft texts in preparation of [one imagines they mean 'for'] a comprehensive and balanced outcome to be presented to the Conference of the Parties for adoption at its seventeenth session: note by the Chair.” In plain English, these are the conclusions the bureaucracy wants.

The contents of this document, turgidly drafted with all the UN's skill at what the former head of its documentation center used to call “transparent impenetrability”, are not just off the wall – they are lunatic.

Main points:

Ø A new International Climate Court will have the power to compel Western nations to pay ever-larger sums to third-world countries in the name of making reparation for supposed “climate debt”. The Court will have no power over third-world countries. Here and throughout the draft, the West is the sole target. “The process” is now irredeemably anti-Western.

Ø “Rights of Mother Earth”: The draft, which seems to have been written by feeble-minded green activists and environmental extremists, talks of “The recognition and defence of the rights of Mother Earth to ensure harmony between humanity and nature”. Also, “there will be no commodification [whatever that may be: it is not in the dictionary and does not deserve to be] of the functions of nature, therefore no carbon market will be developed with that purpose”.

Ø “Right to survive”: The draft childishly asserts that “The rights of some Parties to survive are threatened by the adverse impacts of climate change, including sea level rise.” At 2 inches per century, according to eight years' data from the Envisat satellite? Oh, come off it! The Jason 2 satellite, the new kid on the block, shows that sea-level has actually dropped over the past three years.

Read the entire article

4 Dems join GOP fight to block EPA climate rules

By DINA CAPPIELLO, Associated Press 

Thu Mar 3, 8:12 pm ET

 

WASHINGTON – Four Democrats are joining a Republican effort to block the Environmental Protection Agency from reducing heat-trapping pollution blamed for global warming.

Rep. Nick Rahall of West Virginia, Rep. Collin Peterson of Minnesota, Rep. Dan Boren of Oklahoma and Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia will sponsor a bill supported by 43 Senate and seven House Republicans that would bar the EPA from using federal law to control greenhouse gases from power plants, refineries and other industrial facilities.

The measure is the latest to be introduced in the Republican-controlled House, where at least a half-dozen bills target the EPA and its efforts to control air and water pollution. Several bills blocking or delaying agency rules have also been filed in the Senate, where their fate is far less certain.

None of the EPA's actions is as controversial as its rules on global warming, which Republicans and some Democrats say will raise energy costs and cause job losses in an already fragile economy. The Obama administration counters that controlling global warming pollution is necessary based on scientific evidence that it is threatening public health and the environment. The EPA also says the rules will ultimately yield more health and economic benefits than costs, much like many other Clean Air Act regulations.

Read the entire article

Elite Openly Flaunts Plan To Turn Cities Into High-Tech Slave Grids

Chilling future scenario funded by banks & oil companies depicts authoritarian cities where only the wealthy will be allowed to eat meat, drive cars and choose their own career – all in the name of preventing non-existent global warming

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, January 6, 2010

Not content with depicting children being slaughtered in the name of preventing non-existent global warming, climate change alarmists have embarked on a new propaganda campaign lecturing us all about how we will be forced to live in a “planned-opolis,” where car use will be heavily restricted, CO2 emissions will be rationed, meat will be considered a rare delicacy, the state will decide your career, and only the mega-rich elitists enforcing all these new rules and regulations will be exempt from them.



Browbeating us about how the only solution to expensive fossil fuels is to enforce a “tightly planned and controlled” system, the infomercial (funded in part by oil companies like Royal Dutch Shell), goes on to tell the story of what life will be like in 2040 through the words and actions of a subservient, obedient slave named “Vee” who dutifully acquiesces to the necessity of the new way of things.

Even as Britain shivers under its coldest December in 100 years, and as places as far flung as Southern China suffer unprecedented bouts of freezing rain and cold weather and as the onset of a new mini ice age causes mass die-offs of sea life, the entire piece, produced by the Forum for the Future group, is veiled in debunked rhetoric about CO2 emissions causing rising temperatures.

We soon begin to learn what living in the new “planned-opolis” will look like – food and water is regulated and rationed by a “Global Food Council” which seizes total control over farming. Meat is a rare treat only to be enjoyed on special occasions (mirroring precisely the conditions endured by those in Maoist China).
The state decides what your job will be with “designated career announcements,” nobody has the choice to decide their own vocation.

Movement and behavior is controlled by a calorie credit card linked to a smart phone that rations the amount of travel the citizens of slave-opolis, I mean planned-opolis, are allowed to make. Private ownership of cars will be banned for non-elitists because, “the state knows they just aren’t practical anymore.”

Of course, none of these new rules will apply to the rich elitists enforcing them on the rest of us – it’s made clear in the ad that the wealthy will still be able to roll around in CO2-belching cars whenever they like while everyone else is forced to get government permission and be allocated a time slot in which to use restricted vehicles provided by the “Slick Travel Corporation”.

Read the entire article

Intense climate talks stretch into final hours

By ARTHUR MAX, 

Associated Press

AP – Environmental activists from 350.org, left, demonstrate before the cameras of journalists during the convention

CANCUN, Mexico – Exhausted climate negotiators labored nonstop through the night and into their final day Friday, bargaining intensely over draft accords and seeking small, but essential steps to stem global warming.

If successful, the two-week Cancun meeting will create a fund of $100 billion a year for developing countries threatened by altered weather patterns, and give them the technology to leapfrog old petroleum-based economic development in favor of clean energy.

"This is a crucial day, not only for the process but for the climate," said Joke Schauvliege, a leader of the European Union delegation.

In a late-night session, negotiating groups reported they had settled some disputed wording and clauses, but other knotty issues remained to be sorted out. One issue, related to pledges by industrial and developing countries to rein in emissions of heat-trapping gases, appeared deadlocked.

"We have very limited time," said the conference chair, Mexican Foreign Secretary Patricia Espinosa, affirming that negotiators worked through the night. Delegates were beginning to stumble over their words with fatigue as they described the state of play in the talks.

Despite the reported progress, the EU's top climate official, Connie Hedegaard, said countries were withholding approval on all issues until everything is ready. "Everything is still being negotiated until we have the full package," she told reporters. "Nothing is cut in stone."

Read the entire article

UN Framework Convention on Climate Change to be Held In Cancun Mexico

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!!!
Mark Matheny

A press release was issued from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change setretariat on June 11, 2010, after a two week meeting in Bonn Germany which claims to have tied up the loose ends that had not been settled during the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in 2009.

The results of this "regime" (their words- not mine) are to be presented at the UN Climate Change Conference in Cancún (COP 16) at the end of this year.

Isn't it convenient that progress is taking place for this UN body (UNFCCC), while the President of the United States is campaigning for a climate bill to be passed here in the Senate? And just look where the UN Climate Change Conference will be taking place later this year - Cancun MEXICO!

President Obama said in his address to the nation recently that he was not going to take no for an answer when it comes to passing this bill. Is that why his book had a title with the word "audacity" in it?

I  also wonder - is this why we have allowed El Presidente' Calderon to stand in front of Congress and condemn our country for not taking illegals into ours? Is this why the President is threatening to sue Arizona over the bill that would only be in line with the constitution?

In the press release, Yvo de Boer stated

"A big step forward is now possible at Cancún, in the form of a full package of operational measures that will allow countries to take faster, stronger action across all areas of climate change."

Isn't it also convenient that the Gulf oil Spill (gusher,disaster, or whatever you call it) took place right around the time of these preliminary meetings? Was it perhaps to "shore up" (no pun intended) the deal so that the coming conference in Cancun, and the Kerry-Lieberman bill would then have the full backing of the UNFCCC and a "crisis" to boot?

I have an idea, maybe the president could take all the illegals to Cancun with him!

Just some things to think about.

Special Report: Networks Hide the Decline in Credibility of Climate Change Science

ABC, CBS and NBC ignore ClimateGate scandal and still advance left-wing global warming agenda.



By Julia A. Seymour

Business & Media Institute
4/21/2010 7:21:27 PM



It’s been a rough five months for the credibility of many of the “leading” climate scientists.


First, the ClimateGate e-mails appeared to show unethical or illegal behavior of high profile scientists and a potential conspiracy to distort science for political gain. These weren’t just a few renegade scientists; in the following months, damning information came to light about the world’s leading climate alarmists and their work with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the Stern Report, the U.S. National Climate Data Center and even NASA.

Read the entire article

Editor's Note:You can also learn more about Climategate by going to: http://climategate.tv/

Christian Theologian on Earth Day: ‘Climate Change Is the Totalitarian’s Dream Come True’

Thursday, April 22, 2010

By Penny Starr, Senior Staff Writer

E. Calvin Beisner, founder and national spokesman for the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation, spoke on Earth Day at the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C., about the dangers of global warming activism. (CNSNews.com/Penny Starr)

(CNSNews.com) – For E. Calvin Beisner and his colleagues at the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation (CASC), every day is Earth Day because Christians are called by God to be good stewards of the planet and its inhabitants.

Beisner believes that it is not carbon emissions but global warming activism and international climate treaties that are a threat to the nation’s future and the world’s poorest populations.

“Climate change is the totalitarian’s dream come true,” Beisner, founder of the CASC, said at a conference on Thursday at the Family Research Council in Washington. “It offers a rationale for government intrusion into every aspect of life for every person on Earth.”

Read the entire story

Global Warming: A fraudulent Governmental System

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!!! Exclusive
January 4, 2010
By Amanda Doherty

Global warming is just another scam the government is involved in. It started out according to John Coleman (The founder of the weather channel),with some environmentalists and some politicians from the UN who introduced world earth day in 1970, and from there it traveled in to what it is now-the Cap and Trade bill.



For years this scam has been erupting, setting up a Global emergency, just waiting for the world to be united into One. If this does come into effect, how will our world be if it is united? How many wars will erupt between the lands? This is a ridiculous plan, which I can see failing once citizens become more aware of what is happening, and what our government and other countries are agreeing on in meetings; such as the Copenhagen meeting.


Questions have emerged among millions of Americans on what exactly the Cap and Trade Bill is. According to the Conservation Law Foundation, the cap and trade is "an administrative approach used to control pollution by providing economic incentives for achieving reductions in the emissions of pollutants". This bill is in relevance to the Global Warming and according to the magazine The New American (September 2009), The bill is based on "the unsubstantiated theory that green house gases, in particular carbon dioxide are causing catastrophic warming of the planet." This is absurd, thousands of scientists say global warming is not caused by man but, statements from Obama and others are saying it is. Who will you believe, Scientists who show absolute scientific proof, or a President who is deliberately obstructing the truth with false science?
This bill has been rushed, and little has been said on this matter to citizens. If scientists are coming forward saying there is no need to reduce CO2, then what is the real truth behind this bill besides our economy crashing, taxes rising, more job losses, and middle-class families going poor? How can the President prove humans are the ones who are causing Global Warming?

Before Obama came in to office he was promising involvement with the white house to those who would help the fight against global warming. What he said in Copenhagen is in effect an agenda, that of making the world united in to a one world government. What he failed to mention in his speech to everyone, however, is how our economy will collapse in the process of  formulating this New World Order.


Ken Adachi says Global Warming is a psychological operation, a “psy-ops”, conditioning the public to believe that we are going to be in a lot of trouble in the near future if we don’t take steps “x,y,z”, and do it quickly. Those steps are what the Illuminati want us to follow so they can further consolidate their control over our lives-and still make a ton of money in the process. This is true. The media is a part of the cycle of fabrications, and persuasively distorts the news to the public. This is why the people are oblivious to the “real news” of the world, because it is hidden. The media and the government only want to speak of  "better information" and withhold news that would be devastating to their agenda.

According to the website Educate- yourself.org, Obama insists on talking about how the “The science is settled”, and how Al Gore told Congress the Global Warming crisis is even worse than predicted. The question is, why do they continue to promote a lie? Global warming was never about protecting the environment. It’s nothing more than the excuse to enforce global governance on the planet by creating a new global economy based on the environment rather than on goods and services. The important battle is beginning with the new economic system called the Cap and Trade. “This bill will tax everything, the prices of every item created or run by energy form gasoline to tooth paste to natural gas to hotel rooms, as we sit in our cold, dark homes”, and that is if we even are able to keep our homes. It is said the Cap and Trade will throw out the old system of a free market based on goods and services and operate on the idea that CO2 is a pollutant. Instead of money, wealth will be determined by how many government-issued emission permits you own to allow you to operate your business.

Different countries' representatives are coming together at the United Nations Climate change Conference to propose deals and to collaborate about the bill. Japan has already proposed an offer in Copenhagen with giving 10 million U.S dollars to help developing countries fight global warming over a three year period, and steps to protect biodiversity according to Rie Jerichow. Many debates have been developing in Copenhagen. When will the citizens have their chance to voice their opinions? This is one bill that everyone should be against. People who agree must not understand our world will be affected. Our economy will fall, with an increasing amount of job losses - what will be next after this devastation? What is the plan if this bill does come into effect? Where will the American people stand? Will wars start to erupt all over the world after the bill goes in effect due to promises being broken? These are all questions that need to be answered among others on what our future will hold, for us as well as for our children. This is one obstacle that needs immediate attention so our lives and our coutry are not ruined. Our freedom is slowly being stripped away from us, as stated in the movie The goods, live hard, sell hard. Our freedom has been slowly being ripped from us as the government decides to take action without regard to its people!

Amanda Doherty currently attends Grand Canyon University. She is working toward her bachelor's Degree in science education and special needs (A double major),To become an elementary school teacher.

Four short YouTube segments from the New American Magazine interviewing John Coleman about Global warming.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lk8SSqc7ekM&feature=related video one

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PuyvDCF95U&feature=related video two

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saqIqea6C0s&feature=related video three

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9ZXdX3qtQI&feature=related video four



References

Conservation Law Foundation: Advocacy for New England’s Environment (2009) http://action.clf.org/site/PageNavigator/CapAndTrade?gclid=CNXaoefMyZ4CFRLyDAodgiHjs

Ed Hiserodt, The New American magazine (September 28, 2009) Cap and Trade

Ken Adachi, Global Warming, January 3, 2010 http://educate-yourself.org/lte/globalwarming13sep06.shtml

Rie Jerichow, Japan to unveil 10 billion dollars in climate aid, December 12, 2009 http://en.cop15.dk/news/view+news?newsid=2996

Obama's Push for Copenhagen Deal Could Violate Constitution, Critics Say

Updated December 16, 2009
FOXNews.com

President Barack Obama walks along the Colonnade at the White House in Washington, Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2009. (AP)





President Obama's mission to save the planet from global warming could end up trampling on the U.S. Constitution, critics say.

When Obama arrives in Copenhagen Friday, he is hoping to cut a deal on a new global-warming agreement. Even though the conference is not likely to produce a legally binding deal, critics say if the president signs an international climate treaty pledging reductions in carbon emissions, he will violate the Constitution.

"President Obama cannot bind the American people to job killing international agreements on climate change without the advice and consent of the United States Senate," former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich wrote Wednesday at the conservative Web site Human Events.

The Constitution states that the president cannot sign treaties without the approval of two-thirds of the Senate.

But with climate change legislation stuck in the Senate after the House passed its version earlier this year, the White House is flirting with the possibility of taking action without Congress.

Read entire article

World Net Daily Gets Banned From Coming Copenhagen Convention

December 1, 2009

Mark Matheny

World Net Daily, a prominent Internet News source started by Joseph and Elizabeth Farah "as an independent news company dedicated to uncompromising Journalism"[1] has been denied access to the coming convention in Copenhagen where the conference on climate change will be held this month. Jerome Corsi, a senior staff writer for WND has attended previous UN conferences as a member of the press, but has been denied access by Axel Wuestenhagen, the media coordinator for the UN convention on climate change according to WND.

Joseph Farah recieved a letter from the media coordinator denying accreditation for the event.

"Having now reviewed the application and in consultation with the Media and Accreditation Unit in New York, regrettably, we are not in a position to grant accreditation in this instance," he wrote.

Mr. Wuestenhagen claims that WND did not fall within certain UN guidelines, and that they were under no obligation to any organization which did not meet certain "UN standards and requirements for press accreditation".

WND has threatened legal action if the ban on Jerome Corsi is upheld.

The reason for the ban according to Axel Wuestenhagen's letter stated "as a for-profit subsidiary of the nonprofit Western Journalism Center, we follow the UN guidelines on accreditation which specifies that advocacy publications of nongovernmental or nonprofit organizations do not qualify for media accreditation."

According to Joseph Farah, however, WND has not been a part of the nonprofit Western Journalism Center, since 1999.

The real reason may be due to WND's couragious reporting on the true agenda behind the climate-change convention, which is to create a world government.

According to Wikipedia, WorldNetDaily provides news and editorials, publishes letters to the editor, maintains forums, and conducts a daily poll. The editorial content has a right wing conservative and libertarian perspective, which is more likely the reason for the denial of WND's Jerome Corsi to the convention.

The Obama administration, as well as the U.N., will want to have only the media that will report favorable news concerning the outcome of the conference, so it is likely that you will not find "infowars" corespondents at the conference either. This is reminiscent of the attempt by the Obama administration to exclude Fox News from a Whitehouse meeting, until pressure from other news agencies caused the Whitehouse to relent and allow Fox to also cover the event.

In 2012, the Kyoto Protocol to prevent climate change and global warming runs out, and This is the reason for the Copenhagen meeting. A major group behind the political decisions determined at conference will be made by the IPCC, or The Intergovernmental Panel on climate Change.

 According to IPCC's website,  The Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change is the leading body for the assessment of climate change, established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to provide the world with a clear scientific view on the current state of climate change and its potential environmental and socio-economic consequences.

The IPCC is a scientific body. It reviews and assesses the most recent scientific, technical and socio-economic information produced worldwide relevant to the understanding of climate change. It does not conduct any research nor does it monitor climate related data or parameters. Thousands of scientists from all over the world contribute to the work of the IPCC on a voluntary basis. Review is an essential part of the IPCC process, to ensure an objective and complete assessment of current information. Differing viewpoints existing within the scientific community are reflected in the IPCC reports.

The IPCC is an intergovernmental body, and it is open to all member countries of UN and WMO. Governments are involved in the IPCC work as they can participate in the review process and in the IPCC plenary sessions, where main decisions about the IPCC workprogramme are taken and reports are accepted, adopted and approved. The IPCC Bureau and Chairperson are also elected in the plenary sessions.

On November 19, 2009, emails began to show up on the internet concerning accounts of  some scientists admitting to falsifying evidence to hide the truth behind "Global Warming". These emails belong to the same scientists affiliated with the IPCC. Hackers were able to retrieve the emails from a British University, whereupon it was discovered that several top scientists collaborated in covering up evidence that global temperatures have been declining, and not increasing as Al Gore and his scientific cohorts would have us believe.

One of the emails stated:

The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't. The CERES data published in August BAMS09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.

Another email says:

I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last twenty years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline.

Several sites have reported on these revealing emails including World Net Daily. I believe that WND is being banned for the very reason that they have been unbending in their endeavor to expose the U.N. agenda for what it is- an attempt to bring in a world governing body- a New World Order. George Bush Sr. made it clear in his 1991 speech:

Now we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is a very real prospect of a new world order. In the words of Winston Churchill, a "world order" in which "the true principles of justice and fair play...protect the weak against the strong..." A world where the United Nations, freed from a cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfil the historic vision of its founders." (emphasis ours)  similar speeches were given by Bush Sr. at other times as well.

Again on September 21, 1992, Bush senior spoke these words to the United Nations:

"Nations should develop and train military units for possible U.N. peacekeeping operations... If multinational units are to work together, they must train together....Effective multinational action will also require coordinated command & control and inter-operability of both equipment and communications." 

Barack Obama has also used similar language in his desire for a new world order saying during a speech in Egypt:
"Given our independence, any world order that elevates one nation... over another will inevitably fail." (Obama has mentioned a "world order" at other times as well.)


Of course the whole reason for the establishment of the U.N. by "its founders-" the Elite, is soley for the purpose of a "New World Order".

Censorship and deceit are the ways in which this New World Order will be brought into fulfilment. Secret meetings and bills passed in the dead of night are the norm for those bent on total world domination. We as Americans must be more resolute to understand our world around us, and be willing to step away from the media mind-control machine (your TV), so that we can take back our country from those who seek to hand it over to foreign bankers and a quasi-governing monstrosity which will only enslave and destroy the only real free force left in the world.

The Copenhagen Conspirators must be exposed and stopped!! Only brave individuals like Jerome Corsi, and bold reporting, the kind you find at WND will make this happen!

Mark Matheny.



1. a b Andrew Sullivan (2009). "About Us". The Times. Retrieved 2009-03-15.

CLIMATEGATE: EXPOSED

Mark Matheny

November 28,2009

It looks like Al Gore's "Global Warming" kingdom is starting to crumble due to some 1000 emails and close to 2000 other documents from scientists that were hacked from a British university, and in those emails scientists admit that the globe is not actually warming. “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t,” Dr. Trenberth, a climatologist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, wrote in one of the Emails. Another Email stated "I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline." Clearly this shows manipulation of evidence to support global warming. Below are some videos to give you the full story exposing the Global Warming pseudo scientists and Al Gore's Global Warming House of cards!!

Climate-Gate (Alex Jones)

ClimateGate (Glenn Beck)

ClimateGate: Senator Inhofe on CNBC 

ClimateGate: Probe called for by Senator Inhofe

ClimateGate : Fox rips Global warming Advocate