Showing posts with label Police State. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Police State. Show all posts

“There Were a Lot of Republicans Involved” – Steven Schrage – The Man Who Introduced Deep State Spy Stefan Halper to Carter Page Holds First Interview (VIDEO)

 Gateway Pundit

August 10, 2020


Steven Schrage joined Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures this morning.

Schrage worked with FBI spy Stefan Halper for years.
Steven introduced Stefan Halper to Carter Page back in 2016 while Halper was spying on the Trump campaign.

On Sunday he spoke with Maria Bartiromo in his first interview.

Schrage told Maria, “Halper was not that engaged up to the point he crossed paths with Page and Christopher Steele’s former MI6 boss Sir Richard Dearlove…”

Schrage said he was surprised that Stefan Halper was making over a half a million dollars for writing reports for the government.

Schrage said the key part, the real smoking gun in this is, “All these tentacles lead back to the “small group” including Stefan Halper in SpyGate, Christopher Steele at the center of Russiagate, Stefan Halper’s FBI handler. None of the Senate has subpoenaed or called these people to talk in four years. I think that is the real smoking gun. How are these people being protected?“

Read the entire article

Study: Police More Likely To Shoot Whites Than Blacks

Infowars News
August 23, 2016

A new study comes out and proves that white people are actually more likely to be shot by the police.


BREAKING: Obama Openly Calls for Gun CONFISCATION… Spread This Everywhere

Conservative Tribune
January 5, 2016

We have often been told by gun control advocates that “nobody is coming to take your guns” and all they wanted were “common-sense” gun laws.
However, the gun control reforms they have called for lead inevitably toward national registration of all firearms, which will inevitably lead to confiscation of firearms, which in turn will result in a second civil war or outright revolution.
Belying this end goal, President Barack Obama recently called for America to emulate the strict gun control laws passed in Australia nearly 20 years ago.
Speaking of the horrific 1996 mass shooting in Port Arthur that left 35 people dead and many more wounded, Obama said, “It was just so shocking the entire country said, ‘Well, we’re going to completely change our gun laws’, and they did. And it hasn’t happened since.”
What Obama deliberately failed to mention was what happened after Australia outlawed guns, which was a coercive mandatory buyback of weapons and forced confiscation of firearms from those who resisted.
Bearing Arms pointed out the enormous difference between Australia and the United States: Australia had approximately one million firearms to worry about confiscating from a more or less willing population, while the U.S. has upwards of 300 million firearms held by a population that is dead-set against giving them up.
In fact, as we have clearly seen in both Connecticut and New York, gun owners have remained staunchly opposed to even registering their firearms, so willingly turning them in or sitting back and allowing them to be confiscated simply isn’t going to happen.
Essentially, by calling for America to follow Australia’s lead regarding gun control, Obama has called for America to follow the lead of the colonists in 1776, who were finally pushed into sparking a revolution because of gun control and confiscation of firearms by the British Crown.
Any attempt at national registration, and the mass confiscation that would inevitably follow, will only result in widespread bloodshed and quite possibly an end to America as we have known it — for better or worse.
In other words, “shall not be infringed” means leave our guns alone.  And we are serious about that.

Breaking News: Armed militia, incl. Bundy bros, occupy forest reserve HQ in Oregon, call ‘US patriots’ to arms

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!!! News
January 3, 2016
Mark Matheny

Breaking News




Recently a group of approximately 150 militiamen have seized control of a Federal building in Oregon. According to the Conservative Tribune,

A militia just took over a federal building in Oregon.  Three of the 150 militia members are sons of notorious Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy.They are occupying the headquarters building at the Malhuer National Wildlife Building to keep local ranchers our of prison.  The building is 50 miles outside of Burns, Oregon.The militia is reportedly heavily armed.The militia members are upset that 2 ranchers, Dwight and Steve Hammond, were charged under anti-terrorism laws. The Hammonds were set to report to prison on Monday.The militia believe the Hammonds were illegally prosecuted because they claim the federal government does not have authority at the county level.According to the Washington Examiner, Ammon Bundy said “This facility has been the tool to do all the tyranny that has been placed upon the Hammonds.”Cliven Bundy gained national popularity among patriots who rejected the growing overreach of Barack Obama’s federal government.  He dug his heels in during an armed standoff with federal officials from the Bureau of Land Management.Early Saturday, the Bundy family and 300 protesters marched through Burns before taking over the federal refuge.An unnamed investigative reporter claimed that Ammon Bundy intends to use the refuge as a headquarters for the militia for the foreseeable future.Bundy also has issues a call to sympathetic citizens to join in his efforts and come to the area, according to the Washington Examiner.Ammon Bundy has not yet used any violence. But he said say he will not rule it out if law enforcement officials try to intervene.Bundy claims in the video above, which he posted on December 31, 2015 that God told him to go to Oregon.We fully support the right of patriots to protest and fight injustice but we hope that any issues can be resolved without violence or bloodshed.







Just about a year ago the Bundy Family, along with hundreds of militia and Patriot groups stood up again the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) in open defiance of what the Bundy family felt was unjust taxation of land his cattle had been grazing on.

The stand off was tense and came close to commencing until the BLM backed off at that time.





Crime-Fighting Robots Hitting The Streets In California

Technocracy News and Trends
January 2, 2016

Knightscope Robots
TN Note: The Police State and Total Surveillance Society are joined at the hip. Automated police robots are currently only used as threat assessment and surveillance collection devices, but there will be a time when force/intervention features will be added. These robots are driven by AI, of course, and communicate everything the see, hear and think back to a central computer for analysis. This is a bad trend but one that will greatly further the aspirations of technocrats everywhere. 
The robots might one day rise up and take over, but a Palo Alto startup called Knightscope has developed a fleet of crime-fighting machinery it hopes to keep us safe.
Knightscope’s K5 security bots resemble a mix between R2D2 and a Dalek from Doctor Who – and the system behind these bots is a bit Orwellian. The K5’s have broadcasting and sophisticated monitoring capabilities to keep public spaces in check as they rove through open areas, halls and corridors for suspicious activity.
The units upload what they see to a backend security network using 360-degree high-definition and low-light infrared cameras and a built-in microphone can be used to communicate with passersby. An audio event detection system can also pick up on activities like breaking glass and send an alert to the system as well.
Malls and office buildings are also starting to employ the K5 units as security assistants. Knightscope couldn’t name names, but tells TechCrunch the robots are being used at a number of tech companies and a mall in Silicon Valley at the moment.
CEO Stacey Dean Stephens, a former law enforcement agent, came up with the idea to build a predictive network to prevent crime using robots. He and his co-founder William Li have raised close to $12 million in funding so far from Konica Minolta and others to build on the idea.
While Knightscope doesn’t think its robots will replace mall cops or security guards in the near future, the company does see them as assistants to human security teams. The startup currently rents each five-foot, 300-pound K5 unit out for $6.25 per hour (or less than minimum wage). However, teenagers or others tempted to kick or push the robots over may be shocked to find the robots can talk back to them, capture their behavior on film and alert authorities behind the scenes as well.

NYPD has super-secret X-ray vans

New York Post
October 13, 2015


Police Commissioner Bill Bratton won’t let the NYCLU — or anyone else — bully him for details on the NYPD’s super-secret X-ray vans.
Modal Trigger
Police Commissioner Bill BrattonPhoto: David McGlynn/New York Post
The top cop was asked Tuesday about the counter-terror vehicles, called Z Backscatter Vans, in light of the NYCLU’s request to file an amicus brief arguing that the NYPD should have to release records about the X-ray vans.
“They’re not used to scan people for weapons,” Bratton insisted. “The devices we have, the vehicles if you will, are all used lawfully and if the ACLU and others don’t think that’s the case, we’ll see them in court — where they’ll lose! At this time and the nature of what’s going on in the world, that concern of theirs is unfounded.”
He declined to give more specific details about the devices themselves.
“Those are issues I’d prefer not to divulge to the public at this time,” Bratton said. “I will not talk about anything at all about this — it falls into the range of security and counter-terrorism activity that we engage in.”
The website ProPublica filed suit against the NYPD three years ago after an investigative journalist’s requests for police reports, training materials and health tests related to the X-rays were denied.
Modal Trigger
The Z Backscatter vehicles, also used by US Customs and Borders Protection, can scan for drugs and explosives.Photo: AS&E
New York State Supreme Court Judge Doris Ling-Cohan ruled that the department should have to turn over the records, despite the NYPD’s arguments that disclosing that information could interfere with investigations.
“While this court is cognizant and sensitive to concerns about terrorism, being located less than a mile from the 9/11 site, and having seen firsthand the effects of terrorist destruction, nonetheless, the hallmark of our great nation is that it is a democracy, with a transparent government,” the judge wrote in the December 2014 decision.
The NYPD appealed that decision — and now the NYCLU has requested to file an amicus brief urging the appeals court to uphold the lower court’s original ruling.
“People should be informed if military grade x-ray vans are damaging their health with radiation or peering inside their homes or cars,” said NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman. “New Yorkers have a right to protect their health, welfare and privacy.”
Little is known about how the NYPD uses the high-tech machines, which reportedly cost between $729,000 and $825,000.
The vans are also employed by US Customs and Border Protection to scan for drugs and explosives.

OBAMA COLLECTING PERSONAL DATA FOR A SECRET RACE DATABASE

New York Post
July 20, 2015



A key part of President Obama’s legacy will be the fed’s unprecedented collection of sensitive data on Americans by race. The government is prying into our most personal information at the most local levels, all for the purpose of “racial and economic justice.”
Unbeknown to most Americans, Obama’s racial bean counters are furiously mining data on their health, home loans, credit cards, places of work, neighborhoods, even how their kids are disciplined in school — all to document “inequalities” between minorities and whites.
This Orwellian-style stockpile of statistics includes a vast and permanent network of discrimination databases, which Obama already is using to make “disparate impact” cases against: banks that don’t make enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many blacks; cities that don’t offer enough Section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities; and employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds.
Big Brother Barack wants the databases operational before he leaves office, and much of the data in them will be posted online.
So civil-rights attorneys and urban activist groups will be able to exploit them to show patterns of “racial disparities” and “segregation,” even if no other evidence of discrimination exists.

Pentagon rewrites ‘Law of War’ declaring ‘belligerent’ journalists as legitimate targets

RT News
June 24, 2015

The Pentagon has released a book of instructions on the “law of war,” detailing acceptable ways of killing the enemy. The manual also states that journalists can be labeled “unprivileged belligerents,” an obscure term that replaced “enemy combatant.”
The 1,176-page “Department of Defense Law of War Manual” explains that shooting, exploding, bombing, stabbing, or cutting the enemy are acceptable ways of getting the job done, but the use of poison or asphyxiating gases is not allowed.

Surprise attacks and killing retreating troops have also been given the green light.
But the lengthy manual doesn’t only talk about protocol for those on the frontline. It also has an extensive section on journalists – including the fact that they can be labeled terrorists.
“In general, journalists are civilians. However, journalists may be members of the armed forces, persons authorized to accompany the armed forces, or unprivileged belligerents,” the manual states.
The term “unprivileged belligerents” replaces the Bush-era term “unlawful enemy combatant.”

When asked what this means, professor of Journalism at Georgetown Chris Chambers told RT that he doesn’t know, “because the Geneva Convention, other tenets of international law, and even United States law – federal courts have spoken on this – doesn’t have this thing on ‘unprivileged belligerents’.”
This means that embedded journalists, who are officially sanctioned by the military and attached to a unit, will be favored by an even greater degree than before. “It gives them license to attack or even murder journalists that they don’t particularly like but aren’t on the other side,” Chambers said.
Even the Obama Administration’s definition of “enemy combatant” was vague enough, basically meaning any male of a military age who “happens to be there,” Chambers added.
The manual also deals with drones, stating that there is “no prohibition in the law of war on the use of remotely piloted aircraft (also called “unmanned aerial vehicles”)." Such weapons may offer certain advantages over the weapons systems. It states that drones can be designated as military aircraft if used by a country's military.
The book includes a foreword from the General Counsel of the Department of Defense, Stephen Preston, who states that “the law of war is part of who we are.” He goes on to say that the manual will“help us remember the hard-learned lessons from the past.”
The manual is the Pentagon's first all-in-one legal guide for the four military branches. Previously, each sector was tasked with writing their own guidelines for engagement, which presumably did not list journalists as potential traitors.
The Pentagon did not specify the exact circumstances under which a journalist might be declared an unprivileged belligerent, but Chambers says he is sure “their legal department is going over it, as is the National Press Club and the Society of Professional Journalists.”

Marine held prisoner and threatened with force medication for posting Rap Lyrics on FaceBook.

Pete Santilli Show
June 26, 2015

Brandon Raub visits the show today to give his take on Jade Helm and talk about what life has been like after he was held prisoner and threatened with force medication for posting Rap Lyrics on FaceBook.


Crime Lab Chemist Taints and Forges Tests Leading to 1000’s of Innocent Defendants Incarcerated

BREAKING: Special Forces Drill with Local SWAT for Domestic Raids

Next News 3
May 13, 2015





RICHLAND | In what appears to be the second such drill, Special Forces have been deployed domestically alongside local Sheriffs to train for midnight raids in Richland County South Carolina. 

The footage you’re seeing right now is the 3rd Special Forces Group out of Fort Bragg conducting a nighttime raid during an exercise. This is the special forces unit deployed.

Sheriff Leon Lott stated that “Richland County is “an ideal location for training that cannot be replicated at Fort Bragg.”

Coordinating with the Special Forces will be the county’s Special Response Team - or SWAT to “provide simulated scenarios for the military”

What's more chilling than coordinated domestic raid training is that official reports state that live ordinance and gunfire will be employed.

To top it off the media has been restricted from any kind of embedded reporting to provide Transparency for the drills.

Now you can add this drill to the long list of domestic training exercises that have occurred so far this year. FEMA Camp Roundup drills in Florida, martial law training in California, Marines Prepping for Riot Control in Virginia and of course the mother of all drills JADE HELM. 

This is another glaring example of the militarization of local police nationwide who have received nearly half a billion dollars in military equipment from the department of defense.

So this begs the question. Who is training who? When local sheriffs receive military equipment and then the special forces train alongside SWAT the lines are blurred. The color of authority is transferred to local police as they become a militarized force. Local Law enforcement can’t violate Posse Comitatus… but they can use the same equipment and tactics as the military making them one in the same… just a different jurisdiction thus skirting the law and violating the constitution.

The next question is who is the intended target? I’ll leave that up to you in the comments section below the video… I’ll give you a hint. “You Train where you deploy”
http://www.wltx.com/story/news/milita...
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/01/u...
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/02/l...

Footage courtesy Department of Defense, Richmond County Sheriff's Office, and Maine National Guard. All footage resides in the public domain. 

Judicial Watch: DHS Records Detail Mexican Government Helicopter Crossing Border and Firing on Border Patrol

Market Watch
May 6, 2015


WASHINGTON, DC, May 05, 2015 (Marketwired via COMTEX) -- Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained documents from the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) that confirm a June 26, 2014, attack by a Mexican government helicopter on U.S. Border Patrol agents. The Mexican helicopter crossed into U.S. airspace before firing on U.S. Border Patrol personnel. The Mexican government initially denied that the attack near Arizona's San Miguel Gate occurred, but later admitted to the armed incursion.
The CBP documents were released in response to a July 9, 2014, Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to CBP seeking:
Any and all records regarding, concerning or related to the June 26, 2014 incident near Sells, AZ on the Tohono O'Odham Indian Reservation during which one or more Mexican military helicopters reportedly entered U.S. airspace and fired shots in the vicinity of U.S. Border Patrol personnel.
The CBP records include a description of the record (memo, email, etc.) author, recipients, date of record, etc. The document title notes:
--  [US Border Patrol] Agents from the Tucson Sector Foreign Operations
    Branch were parked approximately 100 yards north of the Border on the
    U.S. Side when they observed a Mexican LEA helicopter cross north into
    the U.S. for approximately 100 yards. The agents then heard and observed
    two rounds being shot from the helicopter which landed approximately 15
    yards to the side of one of the unmarked Border Patrol Vehicles (FOB)
    they were driving. Also, there were two marked vehicles at the scene
    next to the unmarked as well.



--  A total of six Mexican law enforcement helicopters flying near the
    Represito Ranch were observed by the four agents. Two agents were
    driving two marked Border Patrol vehicles and two additional agents were
    in a third, unmarked vehicle when one of the helicopters flew directly
    north and crossed into the US approximately 100 yards. The helicopter
    immediately turned back south into Mexico and landed at the Represito
    Ranch where Government of Mexico (GOM) officers exited the aircraft.
    Five GOM officers walked north and approached the International Border
    Fence where the incident had occurred, and subsequently made contact
    with the agents. The GOM officers apologized for the incident and stated
    that the incident had been reported to their main office in Mexico City,
    D.F.



The information obtained by Judicial Watch revealing that "GOM officers ... stated that the incident had been reported to their main office in Mexico City" directly conflicts with the initial response from the Mexican government. According to the New York Daily News:
Tomás Zerón, the director of the Mexican attorney general's office investigative office, said that Mexican military and federal police who were conducting an operation on a ranch in Altar, Sonora, were shot at by criminals. Mexican authorities never fired any weapons and in fact never crossed into the U.S. side of the border, he said.
Going back a decade, Judicial Watch has forced both the Bush and Obama administrations to release documents detailing intentional border incursions by Mexican military and other government personnel. DHS records show that Mexican military incursions occur quite often and go unpunished by the U.S. For instance, the DHS documents reveal 226 incursions by Mexican government personnel into the U.S. between 1996 and 2005. In 2007 alone, 25 such incursions occurred along the U.S.-Mexico border involving Mexican military and/or law enforcement. The problem has only gotten worse over the years, according to the records obtained in the course of JW's ongoing investigations. In fact, earlier this year a serious incursion occurred in Arizona. Two heavily armed camouflaged soldiers from Mexico crossed 50 yards over the border into Arizona and held American Border Patrol agents at gunpoint in a tense confrontation.
According to information obtained by California Congressman Duncan Hunter from the Department of Homeland Security, there have been 300 documented incursions by Mexican military and law enforcement authorities onto U.S. soil since 2004. Hunter reported on June 17, 2014, that, according to the DHS:
--  There have been a total of 300 documented incursions since January 1,
    2004;



--  Of the 300 documented incidents, there were 152 incidents involving
    armed subjects (totaling approximately 525 subjects);



--  Of the 152 incidents involving armed subjects, verbal or physical
    contact was made with the armed subjects in 81 incidents (approximately
    322 armed subjects in total). An encounter with one of these Mexican
    Government Law Enforcement or Military entities does not always equal a
    standoff or confrontation. It depends on a case-by-case basis where one
    would have to read the narrative completed on the Significant Incident
    Report for the specific incursion;



--  Of the 81 armed encounters, a total of 131 subjects were detained. While
    the number of unauthorized incursions by Mexican authorities is
    relatively few, it is imperative for our officer safety to handle each
    situation assertively but with sensitivity and professionalism.



"It is clear that the Mexican government has little regard for the sovereignty of the United States," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "Our border is insecure and the Mexican government has contempt for our sovereignty. Its military and law enforcement personnel intentionally and without consequence cross our border and place U.S. law enforcement and other innocent Americans at risk. These new documents show how our Border Patrol agents were almost killed by a Mexican 'law enforcement' helicopter that crossed our border and fired on the Border Patrol's clearly marked position. America is placed at risk by the Obama administration's lawless open-borders policy that purposefully fails to protect American citizens and front-line law enforcement from a corrupt Mexican government, the drug cartels, the illegal alien crisis, ISIS and the Islamic terrorist threat."

SOURCE: Judicial Watch

(C) 2015 Marketwire L.P. All rights reserved.

12 Unanswered Questions About The Baltimore Riots That They Don’t Want Us To Ask

The Economic Collapse
April 30, 2015


Why did the Baltimore riots seem like they were perfectly staged to be a television event?  Images of police vehicles burning made for great television all over the planet, but why were there abandoned police vehicles sitting right in the middle of the riot zones without any police officers around them in the first place?  Why was the decision made ahead of time to set a curfew for Tuesday night and not for Monday night?  And why are Baltimore police officers claiming that they were ordered to “stand down” and not intervene as dozens of shops, businesses and homes went up in flames?  Yes, the anger over the death of Freddie Gray is very real.  Police brutality has been a major problem in Baltimore and much of the rest of the nation for many years.  But could it be possible that the anger that the people of Baltimore are feeling is being channeled and manipulated for other purposes?  The following are 12 unanswered questions about the Baltimore riots that they don’t want us to ask…
#1 Why are dozens of social media accounts that were linked to violence in Ferguson now trying to stir up violence in Baltimore?…
The data mining firm that found between 20 and 50 social media accounts in Baltimore linked to the violence in Ferguson, Mo. is now reporting a spike in message traffic in Washington D.C., Philadelphia and New York City, with “protesters” trying to get rides to Baltimore for Tuesday night.
The firm, which asked to remain anonymous because it does government work, said some of the suspect social media accounts in Baltimore are sending messages to incite violence. While it is possible to spoof an account, to make it look like someone is one place and really is in another, that does not fully explain the high numbers.

#2 Who was behind the aggressive social media campaign to organize a “purge” that would start at the Mondawmin Mall at precisely 3 PM on Monday afternoon?…
The spark that ignited Monday’s pandemonium probably started with high school students on social media, who were discussing a “purge” — a reference to a film in which laws are suspended.
Many people knew “very early on” that there was “a lot of energy behind this purge movement,” Baltimore City Councilman Nick Mosby told CNN on Tuesday. “It was a metaphor for, ‘Let’s go out and make trouble.'”
#3 Even though authorities had “credible intelligence” that gangs would be specifically targeting police officers on Monday, why weren’t they more prepared?  On Tuesday, the captain of the Baltimore police tried to make us believe that they weren’t prepared because they were only anticipating a confrontation with “high schoolers”…
Police Capt. John Kowalczyk said the relatively light initial police presence was because authorities were preparing for a protest of high schoolers. A heavy police presence and automatic weapons would not have been appropriate, he said. Kowalczyk said police made more than 200 arrests — only 34 of them juveniles.
#4 Where were the Baltimore police on Monday afternoon when the riots exploded?  During the rioting, CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin said that the “disappearance of the police for hours this afternoon is something that is going to haunt this city for decades”.
#5 Why are police officers in Baltimore claiming that they were instructed to “stand down” during the rioting on Monday afternoon?…
Police officers in Baltimore reportedly told journalists that they were ordered by Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake not to stop looters during yesterday’s riots.
Rawlings-Blake, who waited 5 hours before even making a statement on the unrest, was already under intense critcism for saying that violent mobs were provided with “space” to “destroy” during riots which took place on Saturday.
One Baltimore shopkeeper said that he actually called the police 50 times asking for help and never got any assistance at all.  Other business owners reported similar results.  This is so similar to what we saw back during the Ferguson riots.
#6 Why was the decision made ahead of time to set a curfew on Tuesday night but not on Monday night?
#7 Why were so many police vehicles conveniently parked along the street in areas where the worst violence happened?  After the destruction of a number of police vehicles on Saturday night, the Baltimore police had to know that they were prime targets.  So why were there even more police vehicles available for rioters to destroy on Monday?  And where were the cops that should have been protecting those vehicles?

Military Vehicles Staging Behind Midland Texas Wal-Mart As Choppers Fill Skies - Are 'Blacked-Out' FEMA Buildings Being Built In Kentucky?

All Pipeline News
April 26, 2015



With this Jade Helm 15 'conspiracy theory' story slamming the Houston Chronicle and the state of Texas clearly in the bullseye of it all, the brand new 1st video below from DAHBOO77 from the Wal-Mart store in Midland, Texas shows what appears to be the staging of military vehicles behind the Wal-Mart while an All News Pipeline reader has sent us the pictures at the bottom of the story of a private security contractor called 'Central Defense Security' which, coincidentally or not, was also hanging out at the same Midland, Texas Wal-Mart. 

The videos and pictures below are from separate sources of the same Wal-Mart and both of them depict what might be considered 'unusual activity' considering the buildup now taking place in Texas and across much of America for Jade Helm 15 and what many people feel will eventually lead to the inevitable declaration of martial law that will necessarily come along with the replacement of the US dollar as the world's reserve currency, leaving the US a 3rd world country.




This 2nd video is another one from Dahboo77 giving us more undeniable proof about a HUGE military vehicle buildup taking place across the country now. This video also contains footage of what are called mysterious 'blacked out' FEMA buildings that are now being built up in Kentucky although All News Pipeline has come across evidence that shows these buildings are not tied to FEMA at all and are in fact part of a distillery. We thank our readers who live in that area for setting the record straight and though we're told that a FEMA sign was on the front fence surrounding this building, they share no video or pictorial evidence of such a sign.




The first two photographs below are screenshots of the Dahboo77 video above showing military vehicles sitting on a truck behind the Midland, Texas Wal-Mart. Are those vehicles there in preparation of Jade Helm 15?